The Internet Freedoms
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Formal Metadata
| Title |
| |
| Title of Series | ||
| Part Number | 49 | |
| Number of Parts | 72 | |
| Author | ||
| License | CC Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 Germany: You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this | |
| Identifiers | 10.5446/21375 (DOI) | |
| Publisher | ||
| Release Date | ||
| Language |
Content Metadata
| Subject Area | ||
| Genre | ||
| Abstract |
|
00:00
Multiplication signAddress spaceInternetworkingStaff (military)Level (video gaming)Goodness of fitLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
01:36
MathematicsFundamental theorem of algebraRight angleSpeech synthesisInformation privacyComputer architectureInternetworkingLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
02:33
InternetworkingComputer architectureFitness functionForcing (mathematics)Open setReal numberRule of inferenceSpeech synthesisMeeting/InterviewLecture/Conference
04:04
InternetworkingReal numberPhysical systemCybersexDigitizingDatabase transactionFinite-state machineChemical equationShared memoryInteractive televisionKey (cryptography)Right angleLimit (category theory)Web 2.0Enterprise architectureSoftwareInformation securityDependent and independent variablesPower (physics)MereologyVector potentialVapor barrierField (computer science)Complex (psychology)Focus (optics)Game controllerNeuroinformatikVideo gameProduct (business)Open setMeeting/InterviewLecture/Conference
07:10
Pattern recognitionSoftwareUniverse (mathematics)Open setStandard deviationObservational studySingle-precision floating-point formatTelecommunicationTerm (mathematics)Computer animationLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
08:07
Content (media)Web serviceOperator (mathematics)Uniformer RaumInternet service providerSurfaceWeb 2.0Open setMusical ensembleVapor barrierScaling (geometry)Digital mediaRule of inferenceComputer configurationBusiness modelDifferent (Kate Ryan album)Exploit (computer security)Internet forumMathematicsSet (mathematics)Physical systemServer (computing)State of matterArithmetic meanInternetworkingWeightSystem callLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
10:42
MathematicsArithmetic progressionMultiplication signFreewareWeb 2.0InternetworkingOnline helpOpen setComputer animationLecture/Conference
11:42
Euler anglesCondition numberMathematicsOpen setSet (mathematics)Physical lawExecution unitMoment (mathematics)Web pageMeeting/InterviewLecture/Conference
13:09
Level (video gaming)Physical lawInternet forumImage registrationRule of inferenceContent (media)MereologyChemical equationBlock (periodic table)Digital mediaTraffic reportingLine (geometry)Right angleBlogMathematicsComputer animation
13:56
Physical lawMathematicsNormal (geometry)Open setGroup actionExpected valuePower (physics)Software frameworkSpeech synthesisRight angleAreaFundamental theorem of algebraConfidence intervalUsabilityLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
15:17
Confidence intervalCombinational logicInternetworkingFundamental theorem of algebraPower (physics)Right angleComputing platformBlogSpring (hydrology)Process (computing)Arithmetic meanInformation and communications technologyLecture/Conference
17:12
Point (geometry)Information and communications technologyRight angleMereologyCoordinate systemCybersexConnected spaceLecture/Conference
17:55
Information securityPoint (geometry)Set (mathematics)Information privacyStrategy gameInternetworkingRight angleDependent and independent variablesExterior algebraGame controllerVulnerability (computing)Lecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
19:25
Dependent and independent variablesMultiplication signConfidence intervalInternetworkingNumberOpen setComputer architectureCoalitionInheritance (object-oriented programming)Gaussian eliminationMachine visionLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
21:02
FreewareComputing platformInformation securityInternetworkingExpressionLine (geometry)SummierbarkeitGoodness of fitLecture/Conference
22:08
Digital mediaSoftwareInternetworkingPosition operatorFacebookRevision controlImage resolutionAddress spaceInstance (computer science)Latent heatTerm (mathematics)Lecture/Conference
23:03
Open setRule of inferenceBitGame theoryWeb serviceTerm (mathematics)Product (business)Context awarenessDisk read-and-write headOffice suiteInternetworkingFacebookGoogolMultiplication signDifferent (Kate Ryan album)TelecommunicationMachine visionOperator (mathematics)SurfaceType theoryCASE <Informatik>Lecture/Conference
25:59
Model theoryRight angleGame controllerInternetworkingDirection (geometry)Open setRule of inferenceGame theoryLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
27:01
InternetworkingPosition operatorNumberSoftware developerPhysical systemRule of inferenceBitAuthorizationField (computer science)Game theoryTelecommunicationFamilyFigurate numberMeeting/Interview
29:19
ResultantTraffic reportingDigital electronicsRule of inferenceGame theoryInternetworkingElectronic mailing listNumberPosition operatorLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
30:20
MereologyWeightLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
31:05
Standard deviationInformation securitySpectrum (functional analysis)Position operator1 (number)State of matterStrategy gameChannel capacityLimit (category theory)Cloud computingRule of inferenceNumberWeightSystem callMultiplication signPoint cloudLine (geometry)Pattern languageLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
34:44
InternetworkingEvent horizonSystem callBitServer (computing)Formal languageProcess (computing)Web 2.0Cellular automatonQuicksortPerspective (visual)BlogLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
35:48
Web 2.0Message passingPhysical systemContent (media)Dependent and independent variablesDifferent (Kate Ryan album)Office suiteSystem callTerm (mathematics)Arc (geometry)WaveBasis <Mathematik>Boss CorporationLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
38:05
Electronic mailing listMiniDiscState of matterVapor barrierMoment (mathematics)Physical systemBasis <Mathematik>Musical ensembleLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
40:41
Mathematical optimizationSlide ruleElectric generatorEuler anglesAreaRight angleMultiplication signCircleNormal (geometry)Decision theoryMaxima and minimaSystem callLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
41:38
Online helpMeasurementRight angleAxiom of choiceSpeech synthesisMusical ensembleProof theoryLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
43:06
Decision theorySpeech synthesisPhysical systemLine (geometry)Product (business)Multiplication signTraffic reportingOnline helpPoint cloudForm (programming)Projective planeWeb serviceWebsiteCloud computingLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
47:00
Computer virusProjective planeFreewareLecture/Conference
47:43
PlastikkarteComputer virusLoop (music)Physical systemPosition operatorSpeech synthesisForm (programming)Directed graphSampling (statistics)Distribution (mathematics)Right angleMeeting/InterviewLecture/Conference
50:17
BitDrop (liquid)Form (programming)Touch typingProduct (business)WordOnline helpTerm (mathematics)State of matterComputer programmingLine (geometry)Web serviceNumberDependent and independent variablesVirtual machine1 (number)CountingMeeting/Interview
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
00:13
Good morning everybody, this is the first time I had an experience that before coming on stage,
00:23
a gentleman was asking me, take off your earrings, and I said, is that the end? And he promised me, that's the end, for otherwise we were facing a problem. And I'm going to talk about freedom online and not freedom for gentleman to ask me to take off stuff.
00:43
Why freedom online? Why matters? Why we must protect it and how we are doing that? That is what is main in my address today. And I know that many of you in this campaign for internet freedom are quite active and please don't stop.
01:05
We need you, I need you to give indeed the backing for a policy that is focused and faced on freedom online. The internet is the new frontier of freedom in western democracies, but also around the world.
01:26
It's not stopping in Europe, it's not stopping in the developed countries, it is all over the globe so to say. It's changing the politics, it's changing the policies, the economies in the world,
01:41
and some find that change too disruptive, that it is too challenging and they want to stop it, and therefore I need your activity, for we can't afford, we don't want to have that limited speed.
02:03
But remember how many kinds of freedom we can promote and protect online. It's not only talking about fundamental freedoms, like freedom of speech and the right to privacy, that is quite clear, but it's also talking about the freedom to innovate.
02:23
It is also talking about rewarded and recognized for your own bright ideas in the way you think it, and you think fit, and the freedom of the internet architecture as a whole, so far more than just a couple of principles.
02:44
Yes, the internet should be open, and yes it should be free, but that's not the same as being a lawless wild west, and that we have to discuss too. We have recently seen how many thousands of people are willing to protest against rules,
03:05
which they see as constraining the openness and innovation on the internet, and I have deep respect for them. It's a strong new political voice, and as a force for openness, I welcome it,
03:21
even if I do not always agree with everything it says on every subject. But that is democracy, isn't it? It is freedom of speech, it is activating a dialogue. We are now likely to be in a world without SOPA and without ECTA.
03:43
You are hearing it correctly, without the two. Now we need to find solutions to make the internet a place of freedom, openness and innovation, fit for all citizens, not just for the techno-avant-garde like you.
04:03
And the fact is that sometimes online activities have real world implications. And like it or not, people sometimes use online tools to conspire for horrific crimes,
04:20
like murder or child abuse. And others launch cyber attacks to breach or destabilize internet systems. Attacks which increasingly impact on people's daily lives as ever more transactions go digital. I know that this is the tiny minority of online activity, and I know that we can't overreact.
04:49
As in other fields of life, we must balance liberty and security. The two need to be in balance. But neither can we ignore it.
05:01
And the internet has become too important to just leave its future to good fortune. That doesn't work. That is why we must recognize rights and responsibilities online for an online world that is an increasingly important part of our society.
05:23
And today I would like to focus on the future, on the chance for internet freedom to unlock Europe's potential. Increasingly, people are realizing that the web is capable of powering seemingly infinite innovation.
05:43
And that we don't have to be constrained by the habits of the past, but can be released by the opportunities of the future. Isn't that nice? Opportunities of the future. And that whole industry, once based on limitation and control,
06:02
could now be based on customer focus, sharing and interactivity. Freedom online can deliver that potential to innovate. But systems that are dated, closed or complex can strangle it.
06:22
What can freedom online give us? For one thing, a huge economic boost. An open internet can power innovation, surge productivity, and can put innovation tools into the hands of ordinary, enterprising people.
06:41
And that's why I'm convinced, ladies and gentlemen, web entrepreneurs are the key to our future growth. And I want to make sure they have the tools to innovate, web entrepreneurs. Those people can do amazing things if the only barrier was their creativity and imagination.
07:04
We have no problem at all, but I know there are other barriers. Entrepreneurs need tools to network better, and I'm working on that, I promise you. They need credit and political recognition.
07:20
They deserve, and our recent Tech All Stars competition is looking for Europe's hottest start-up talent. And they need our universities to be innovation hubs. Inspiring, empowering the innovators of tomorrow, and I'm working on that too.
07:40
And I'm also working on open standards for open markets. We still haven't completed our telecom single market. A recent study showed that this could be costing us as much as 110 billion euros per year. So this year we will engage with European standardization bodies and the industry
08:04
to determine the best way forward. For standards, that means content providers and operators can get a uniform service offering, avoid duplicate charges, and exploit economies of scale.
08:21
We also need to preserve openness of access to internet service, what some call net neutrality. People need transparent offers so they know they are getting what they pay for. They need to be able to easily switch providers or deals if they don't like the service they are getting.
08:46
And they need to always have the option of accessing the full unlimited best efforts internet, if that's what they want. But most of all, web entrepreneurs need us to identify and deal with the barriers
09:02
that stand in their way of their online freedom. Obstacles, like complicated and incompatible systems for identifying and paying and licensing like 27 different sets of rule books when there could be one.
09:20
One single digital market, so to say. And all those things can crush innovation and keep bright ideas confined in unprofitable national markets. Because freedom also means that freedom to innovate in business models. One by one, different sectors are facing up to new online realities
09:46
and to the decline of old ways of doing business and the rise of new opportunities. The music sector realized that long ago, other sectors like audiovisual are now starting to.
10:00
Our Media Futures Forum is looking at how this applies to the media sector in general. Of course, changing for the digital age doesn't mean always giving material away free of charge. But it does mean we need to be open to new approaches, new ways to distribute,
10:25
new ways to be rewarded for work and new ways for people to access great online content easily. Sometimes people are prevented from making this change by out-of-date rules and practices
10:42
like those on copyright licensing. Other times, it's just that they need a change of mindset, that they are too comfortable with old habits to realize the world has changed. Either way, we need to wake up, we need to smell the coffee.
11:02
This is why I am frustrated about the lack of progress in creating a genuine digital single market. And if we are really going to help a free internet and help web entrepreneurs in particular, we must promote an open culture.
11:21
And in particular, I think public sector data is a goldmine just sitting there. If we unlock it, if we could boost creativity, boost the economy and boost democratic accountability, and that is why we have proposed legal changes that will show the way forward on open data,
11:43
making data cheaper and easier to reuse, meaning more datasets with less complicated conditions. It's not just about unlocking new datasets. It is about promoting a whole new attitude within governments about openness culture online,
12:05
creating a new fuel for innovation within our single market. And I admit, this would in one sense be a relatively modest step. But it's an important one, affecting the change to an open mindset,
12:23
and it could be a prelude to the wider work needed on copyright reform. At the moment, it is still just a proposal on open data. And before becoming law, it needs the democratic scrutiny and approval of the European Parliament
12:41
and the national governments in council. I'm convinced, ladies and gentlemen, of the benefits. I'm convinced of the public's appetite for change. And so I'm calling on those institutions to agree, the proposals swiftly and ambitiously. And if you have ideas for how we can make it more convincing to them, please let me know.
13:09
But of course, there is another very significant thing we mean by freedom online. It is about freedom to express yourself, a fundamental right and a pillar of a democracy.
13:24
We must defend it online and off. Last year, Hungary introduced a new media law, as you are aware. Significant parts were incompatible with European law.
13:40
Not least because rules about registration and balanced reporting could have imposed heavy obligations on all kinds of online content, from online forums to personal blogs. So I pushed for and achieved changes to those proposed rules.
14:02
And since then, Hungary's own constitutional court has ruled that the new law unconstitutionally limited freedom also for the written press. Both the European Commission and the Council of Europe continue to have concerns that this law is not fully compatible with our European norms.
14:26
The Hungarian government needs to do more. And we will follow it, I can assure you. It is an important area. Clearly, there are high public expectations for the EU's ability to act.
14:40
But equally, we can only enforce fundamental rights in areas subject to EU law. So we need to think seriously about whether the EU has sufficient powers in this area. In the EU, of course, our freedom of speech is protected by law.
15:05
All actions taken place within a framework of safeguards and legal protections, as well as a well-established political culture that favors openness. And that gives me confidence that problems that arise can be fixed
15:22
through a combination of legal tools and political dialogue. And as you might know, yesterday was UN World Press Freedom Day. A day to remind us that around the world, people, including journalists and bloggers,
15:40
do not always enjoy the same rights we have in the EU. One example is Enula Futulaya, an Azerbaijan journalist and human rights activist, and this year the winner of the UNESCO's World Press Freedom Prize. And he is doing a great job.
16:03
Indeed, many don't always have the right to an open, democratic debate, nor the legal protection of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, nor safeguards like oversight and recourse. In spite of that, indeed, because of it, in such places,
16:23
the right to express oneself is all the more important. And for those who struggle for democracy, we just ensure they have a voice. The internet can give them that voice. We saw that with the Arab Spring.
16:41
The internet alone didn't cause that uprising. It's much more complicated than that. We all are aware. But clearly online platforms gave protesters a means to organize and a harness for the power of a surging desire for democracy.
17:03
In Egypt, the government tried to turn off the internet in a failed attempt to silence this Kant. Elsewhere, despotic governments use communications technology as a tool of surveillance and repression.
17:22
We cannot allow that to happen. Where countries struggle for democracy, I want to ensure there is no disconnect. And we will be doing that in many different ways. By supporting those brave human rights defenders who work against cyber censorship in undemocratic regimes,
17:45
through human rights guidelines to ensure EU companies play their part, and through European and international coordination. There's one final point I'd like to make. And that is about freedom.
18:02
Too often, freedom and security are caricatured in incompatible alternatives. As so measures to ensure one can only be at the expense of the other. In fact, the opposite is true. Because there is no freedom without security.
18:23
These concepts are interdependent and they are complementary. And I may have the legal right to walk down a particular road at night. But am I truly free to do so if it's not safe?
18:41
Likewise, people aren't really going to use the internet freely unless they know they are in control of their privacy. That their personal data will be handled transparently and fairly. And that interdependence is why liberty and security are mentioned in the very same article.
19:03
The very same sentence of the European Convention on Human Rights. On Wednesday, last Wednesday, we launched our strategy to create a better internet for kids. For me, that is crucial. I think we have the responsibility for those vulnerabilities in our society.
19:24
Safety is all the more important for the most vulnerable and assuring this is everyone's civic responsibility. And at the same time, I realize that the online world can be a great place for kids to discover,
19:43
to learn, to interact and to create. But only when they have the confidence to freely explore. There are two main strengths to my philosophy there. Number one, we must avoid crushing the openness and freedom that drives online innovation.
20:02
To avoid collateral damage to the internet architecture. And second, we must acknowledge that we can never totally eliminate risk for children. We can just reduce them. Sadly, children will always face risk online.
20:20
Just as they will always face risk like traffic in the real world. Rather, we need simple tools that educate and empower children and enable them to deal with those risks. Just as we do in the offline world, so to say. And I'm pleased that the leading internet companies have joined a coalition to make the internet a better place for children.
20:45
They are working together to develop solutions. To develop solutions before the end of the year to empower parents and the children. And that is my vision for a free and an open internet.
21:02
At once, a vehicle for innovation, a platform for free expression and a place to exercise the liberties ensured through safety and security. And the best thing about the internet is that it is open.
21:20
And intent to keep it that way is my strong belief and my line. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Nelly Cruz.
21:41
Ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to ask a question. Are there any questions? One moment, please. Yes, please. Hello, good morning. Thanks for your keynote.
22:08
I have one specific question that basically addresses one of the, in my opinion, basic issues that the internet has is that all relevant infrastructures, especially the companies, are turning into monopolies.
22:25
And for instance, we see companies like Google, Facebook and Apple battling with each other. They all rely on a network economy and they all turn into monopolies. And that the interdependence between, let's say, traditional media companies
22:42
and those infrastructure companies is starting to become even more difficult. Now all those companies are buying, for instance, patents left and right and strengthening their monopoly position. And isn't that the opposite of what you are trying to achieve?
23:02
That's basically the question. Thank you for your challenging remark and question. I'm pragmatic and I'm realistic. I'm aware of what is at stake. I don't need to explain to you with my past.
23:21
In my first term in office in the commission, I was the one who had to deal with competition policy. And I'm certain that most of you are aware that I was not only preaching that I'm against monopoly and misbehaving and abusing situations, but that I was also acting.
23:42
We should make a difference between how a monopoly, quote unquote, is dealt with. And therefore, and sorry to take a bit more time to explain what anyhow my vision is, we need clear rules of the game. And only saying we don't like the US, Google, by the way, Google and Facebook and Apple,
24:06
and they all are global companies with, in most cases, head offices in the US. But anyhow, they are global companies and they have to follow the rules of the game.
24:21
And that is where I absolutely am acting if they are not following the rules of the game. And, of course, telecom operators, the incumbents, but not only the incumbents, are complaining that they are using their infrastructure. We should, for more than we are doing, also try to be active in the services and in the products that they are offering.
24:49
I'm not the one who is fearing difficulties. I am the one who is trying to use all the open internet possibilities and opportunities.
25:02
And what is at stake? And therefore, I ask you, give me food for thought. For in itself, we are all aware that the products of the Googles and the Apples and the Facebooks are absolutely preferred by most of the citizens.
25:20
So, quite often, people are complaining and when I'm looking, they do have the iPad, they do have the iPhone, and they are on internet and they are using the Facebook. So, we should be quite precise. What is at stake? And I'm not the one who is blocking services that are taking into account the rules of the game.
25:41
And so far, I think that what is mentioned, following the rules of the game, and we have to do more, by the way, we have to do more to be transparent and precise in what are the rules of the game and working on that. Thank you. Sinter, any more questions?
26:10
Hi. I'd also like to thank you for your introduction. It was quite interesting. I do have one question related basically to the previous one.
26:20
You just asked for food of thought. So, I think if we want to protect the internet and keep it an open place, wouldn't you agree that it's probably the best idea to make sure that there's no single party who can control it? So, like in Egypt, where the government was able to take down the internet,
26:41
I think that shows that no matter who is in control, it's a problem, whether it's companies or governments. There are a couple of efforts trying to basically create an infrastructure where nobody can control the internet. Let me think that is the direction things should take.
27:00
In general, I couldn't agree more, but again, I'm coming back to the rules of the game. Then those users of internet, and thanks heaven, there are quite a number by the way, I'm still worried about a high number of European citizens that have never visited internet.
27:23
Can you imagine? I just visited Italy and I got the latest figure. 41% of the Italian population has never ever visited the internet. Thanks heaven, the general figure in Europe is a bit more positive, but still is worrying.
27:43
It is around 30% and taking into account that our system with all those new technology challenges is based on that. I can't afford to accept those exclusive numbers in the traffic of internet, but I'm misusing your question.
28:06
What is at stake that the rules of the game are there, and that it's not only that they are there, but that they are indeed taken into account? That is a bit my worry. We also are talking about the copyright.
28:23
If someone is asking me what in your portfolio is worrying most, two issues. The role of the copyright not solved yet and not up to date, so to say, and that is connected with the rules of the game and that is connected with what are you accepting in the internet.
28:43
Is there an authority needed? Yes or no? Well, we do have some experience in other fields in competition, but also in telecom and so on. I'm not in favour for Big Brother is watching you if everybody is taking the rule, not only for granted, but seriously.
29:06
Having said that, we should be aware, and the other one of my worry is the position of children. I think they are the vulnerable in the whole internet development, and that we have to do quite a bit, and therefore I'm grateful and looking forward to the result of that report of the 31 CEOs that will deliver
29:28
hopefully practical solutions for having more trust and certainty. All in all, and we learn from those countries, and you were mentioning one, Egypt,
29:43
but it is not the only one on the list, so to say. There are quite a number. We still have to be aware that there is a lot of abuse and misuse. It's not only positive news, internet. It's also misused by certain regimes, so to say.
30:04
So, follow the rules of the game, for otherwise the game is over. It's just like football. If there are no rules, or if the rules are just tackled, then the game is not fun anymore.
30:23
I would like to ask you two questions. Could you go into more detail on two issues? One is net neutrality. What are your intentions to make sure net neutrality will exist in the future? And the second is, you mentioned that you will make sure EU companies will play their part
30:47
in countries where there's struggle against dictatorship. How will you make sure that EU companies won't deliver technologies that enable surveillance in censored countries?
31:04
Net neutrality. I will start discussions about net neutrality. Let's be clear that we are on the same wave, so to say, or on the same page, and that our definition of net neutrality is there.
31:22
I follow the rule, and I follow the definition of net neutrality, that it is possible for everyone to join, and that indeed taking into account that there is a limitation on the capacity that we have to give the floor to everyone, but that can be a follow in which that is given.
31:46
We are preparing a proposal, and I am absolutely certain that there will be a discussion afterwards, and I'm looking forward to that discussion. But there is no special treatment for one, and there should be competition.
32:02
And that is main, for if there is competition, it is up to you in your situation, if you think that you are not treated in a decent way, to just move to another one, and that should be possible. So that is answer question one. Question two, I'm taking this question to just push on the standardization,
32:27
for we should indeed make far more global standardization efforts. Yesterday, I had a cup of coffee with a minister of the Japanese government,
32:41
and we were pushing again, for we are talking about an issue that is global. It's not limited, it's not ring fence for Europe or US, it is really global. We need to have standardization. We need to be aware that we are losing time if we are not doing that, and that is giving an answer to your question too.
33:02
For then, it can't be, it shouldn't be misused by certain companies in saying, this is it, and that's all that there is, no way. But we also should take into account, and taking your question for another love baby so to say,
33:22
it's cloud computing, and I'm certain that quite a number of you are interested what's going on with cloud computing. We are preparing a strategy for cloud computing, for my main worry is that if we, Europe, if we are not able to give our strategy,
33:43
our thoughts and our philosophy about cloud computing, then we are in a position that other ones, that for example the US, is dictating how we should follow the line. Don't misunderstand me, I'm not pleading for a European cloud,
34:00
but I'm pleading, and more than pleading, I'm preparing for a huge discussion, and a very interesting discussion, what Europe's position is in cloud computing. For me, it is a tremendous challenge, and it is connected with the citizens. It's not only talking about big companies, the multinationals or whatever,
34:22
it's talking about the small and medium sized companies, it's talking about the citizens. If you just have a cloud locker with you, the only one who has the locker key, then it is also connected with trust, security, and with a less cost pattern than we are used to.
34:47
Hello, my name is Henrik, I'm an internet activist and journalist. I'm very happy to see an EU commissioner at an event like this, so thank you very much for being here and touching on so many important issues. One issue that I wanted to get a bit more into detail with is ACTA,
35:03
because I think there's been a very strong disconnect between the sort of emotions and ways of expressing themselves from, I think, a Polish blogger term, we the web kids, and sort of this movement and what happens on your turf in the EU commission, a language which came from the trade commissioner, which seemed to be very one-sided,
35:24
if you see it from the other perspective, and vice versa, allegations of being undemocratic, and I'm very happy to hear that you at least see this movement as a democratic movement, but I'm interested in hearing your personal experience of this process, because personally I find that ACTA should have been dismissed solely on grounds of purpose,
35:40
and so I'm interested in how in the future we can ensure processes that hear both voices. Thank you. I was just thinking when you were mentioning I'm one of the web kids, I would love to be at the end of my term in office one of the web mothers, so okay.
36:01
But then you will certainly face me, then you have to prove, and that makes sense. ACTA. First a general line, if you allow me. I think that talking about movements, and I'm a big believer in democracy,
36:20
I don't need to explain that, we all are, we are looking forward to far more discussion, and what did happen was the big movement in the outside world is facing not only Brussels, all the capital, so to say, that there is a difference in just voting with your feet
36:45
and with the legal preparation in a democratic system. I'm not saying that one is better than the other, but both need each other. And what was for me, and I'm talking on a personal base,
37:01
what was the most important one is that this was a wake-up call for anyhow Brussels. So it was not anymore, aren't they worried that we are doing our utmost and so on. No, it was knocking the boat, and indeed a wake-up call.
37:20
Having said that, and don't worry about ACTA anymore, I was quite explicit, I'm certain that when I'm back in Brussels that I will get a message that I was too explicit, but I'm always saying I'm Dutch, so straightforward, come on. And I don't need a new term in office.
37:42
Having ACTA itself, that is what I'm asking you to think over. So keep ACTA away, but the content of ACTA was connected with copyright as far as my responsibility was at stake.
38:00
And I am one of those believers that artists, creators, writers, they need decent remuneration. If we don't give them a decent remuneration, then culture is over, to say. And I will never forget that one of the big singers was coming over for a cup of coffee,
38:20
and that he was saying, Neely, if you don't are aware that we need to get decent living. And he explained to me that he had already a very decent living, so he was not talking about himself, but about his successor, so to say. And I'm aware of that. So copyright needs to be filled in, and not filled in ten years ago
38:46
with that old-fashioned way, but with the new technology in mind. And what I'm worried about, and that is what ACTA is also approaching, but again, gone, but we have to solve the problem that is at stake,
39:03
and that is the copyright, that we have to find a way in which talking about a digital single market, so that means no borders anymore, no barriers anymore, but with talking about music, but also the audiovisuals, and so on and so forth.
39:21
We are facing that it's all ring-fenced by the collective societies. Well, if I have enemies, and I can assure you I have a long list of enemies, on that list are the collective societies, and I can't care less, for they are monopolists, and we are touching upon that one earlier.
39:40
That is not about protecting the artist and the writers and the creators. It is about protection that system, and perhaps it made sense a long time ago, but it doesn't make sense at this moment, and as long as we are not solving that problem, and as long as we are just looking in the real world,
40:04
that illegally downloading stuff is at the end of the day, just cutting off the fees for the copyright for the artist, and just talking about Germany, 94, 95% of the artists in Germany
40:24
are only getting 1,000 euros copyright on an annual base. Well, if we are aware of that, then there's something rotten in the state. That can't be the real world.
40:42
So, let's fight for that, and ACTA is food in the cold hands, and we know that it's time-consuming, and we know nearby what the outcome will be, but okay, but let's not stop our activity for solving the copyright, and the longer we wait, the more it is getting a normal attitude,
41:05
for it's not anymore the younger generation that is illegally dealing with that stuff. It is also around my circle of friends, so to say, and I don't accept that, but we are to be blamed
41:20
as long as we haven't taken the right decisions. So, a long story answer for your question. That demonstration in the streets is a wake-up call for us, that we are in a hurry, and that time is not our friend. Good afternoon. We are coming to you.
41:40
In five minutes, we will ask any more questions. Right now, waiting for your hands. Sorry to bother again, but I can't kind of help
42:02
but have to ask a question here, because you talk about copyright, and you say, you know, without copyright there will be no more art, and literature, and music, and that kind of is a weird thing, because when copyright was introduced about, I don't know, four or five hundred years ago as a measure of censorship, because that is how it started in England, I believe,
42:24
you would say there has been no art, and literature, and music until five hundred years ago. I mean, that's kind of a weird thing. I think the fact that you say that 95% of the people here in Germany don't get more than, say, a thousand euros for their creative works per year,
42:43
and yet there is a huge amount of creative work being created, I think in itself is proof enough that, I'm not saying we don't need copyright, but if it comes to a choice between freedom of speech and copyright, I way prefer freedom of speech, because I think the arts will do just fine without copyright.
43:09
Anyhow, not everybody was applauding, so don't make the wrong decision that you get the whole audience on your side.
43:27
Your example of a long time ago compared to now is not completely correct, and of course it's up to you to do that, for what we are talking now is with new technologies
43:43
where people can indeed be far more creative in their own way of just taking an artist's product and not giving a remuneration. I'm happy with, and I'm grateful to your question,
44:01
for it gives me an opportunity to correct myself a bit. I'm not a strong protector of copyright as copyright as a system. I'm in for more creative forms of remuneration. My only for copyright is an instrument. If you know a better instrument,
44:22
and by the way, with the technology development, talking about cloud computing, there will be for me absolutely certain a proposal where we can tackle the copyright system in a better way than we did before. And we see already with initiatives, Spotify,
44:41
and there are a lot of examples where the industry is so creative that anyhow for the consumer and the connecting of the devices, it's possible to deal with it in a legal, in a proper way, so to say. So for me it is, I think that everyone who is creative
45:02
and who is just making something, service, product, or whatever, that at the end of the day there is a decent remuneration for that. And it's nothing to do with freedom of speech. I'm a liberal, so I would curse in the church
45:20
when I would say I'm not in favor for freedom of speech. And I sincerely hope that you got already from my acting so far that I am indeed not shy to act if that is needed. By the way, very interesting, but that is talking about freedom of speech. I asked a couple of wise people to prepare a report talking about freedom of speech.
45:47
And they are absolutely, four of them, a former minister of justice of Germany, a former president of one of the Baltic states,
46:00
and an acting professor and a former advocate general of the court in Luxembourg. They are preparing freedom of speech principles, and that will make a big rock in the boat also in the European Parliament for I don't accept anymore that if one country is acting
46:21
not in line with our principles that we just say, well, let's find out how we can just protect them and so on. It's over. We should be aware that our democracy in Europe is based on principles and freedom of speech is one of a very important issue. So, for me, it is not.
46:42
There is only one way of copyright. Be creative and give us a hand and the technology will give us a help. But it is, at the end of the day, not a free lunch. We have one last question over here.
47:02
Hello. My name is Wolfgang Zengers and I'm one of the co-initiators of the Cultural Commons Collecting Society. It's an initiative to found a new collecting society for free licenses and non-commercial creative commons licenses.
47:21
And looking at the topics that you considered to look for new ideas in licensing and for copyright, would there be a chance to support such a project from your side, from your bureau?
47:44
At the end of this session, come over and give me your card and let's discuss it if there is a ground to go on. Yeah? Okay, thank you. Here is one. Yeah, the last question.
48:02
Hello. I just wanted to address the copyright topic again because I want to clarify something that may not be clear to some of you because copyright is not the same thing as distributing art. Copyright is the right the artist holds itself
48:22
and I think it's correct to hold onto that. But what we need is a reform of ways to distribute art, to make money, to guarantee artists that they can live off their art.
48:40
And I think copyright is not the problem itself. It's the problem that the artist do not get directly a reward for their work. And with your position on ACTA, for example,
49:02
I think it's a very important thing to also consider citizens worries that will come with the introduction of such new things like ACTA
49:20
or outside the EU, CISPA or other things are in the discussions as well. It's a global movement, I think. And I want to ask you what kind of efforts will you,
49:42
does the EU intend to achieve a reform on art distribution or rewarding artists better without taking freedom of speech
50:04
or installing, for example, a filtering or surveillance system in the digital world? Just make it quite clear, not giving hope for an issue that I can't fill in.
50:23
For a normally spoken, I'm following the line that I can be quite clear in what is within my responsibility and what's not. Copyright, whatever new form and so on, is for me talking about a decent remuneration
50:42
of a product or service that is already delivered. And that is if you are doing something for your living, then you are also expecting that you can earn a decent living out of it. Having said that, what you are touching upon is in general terms
51:03
what could be done for an artist-friendly climate, if I get your question correct. That's not within my portfolio, number one. And that is not really what is in the portfolio of the European Commission, for you know that there is still quite a bit linking in the hands of the member state itself.
51:28
So this is far more for member states itself, and I wouldn't touch upon the policy of the German government, neither of governments, for example my government at home.
51:45
Having said that, the European Commission is stimulating in the form of grants and in the form of pushing programs for artists, too. But that is just a drop in the ocean of the issue that you are counting.
52:02
But let's first solve the other problem, for that for me is main. And I promise you that I won't rest before we have done more, but I need your help, I need your backing, and demonstrations like you did before would just give me a hand
52:21
talking about pushing my colleagues in the college, too.