The Dawn of the Fullerenes: A Research Adventure
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Formal Metadata
Title |
| |
Title of Series | ||
Number of Parts | 340 | |
Author | ||
License | CC Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International: You are free to use, copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor. | |
Identifiers | 10.5446/55126 (DOI) | |
Publisher | ||
Release Date | ||
Language |
Content Metadata
Subject Area | ||
Genre | ||
Abstract |
|
00:00
BaryteGas to liquidsChemistryMachinabilityAtomic numberSurface scienceFullereneAtomclusterMeeting/Interview
00:55
HeliumAtomic numberAtomclusterSurface scienceMeeting/Interview
01:30
ChemistryMass spectrometryAtomclusterMeeting/Interview
02:05
Combustion chamberPhysical chemistryMarch (territory)MachinabilityWine tasting descriptorsAtomclusterMeeting/Interview
02:40
MachinabilityChemical compoundMeeting/Interview
03:15
ChemistÜbergangszustandAtomic orbitalMachinabilityOptische AktivitätMeeting/Interview
03:50
Chemical reactionChemistryCarbon (fiber)HydrogenSpeciesSurface scienceElectronic cigaretteStickstoffatomKohlenstoff-14Meeting/Interview
04:25
ChemistryFunctional groupMarch (territory)AtomclusterMeeting/Interview
05:00
Carbon (fiber)SpeciesAtomclusterMeeting/Interview
05:35
Chemical reactionZunderbeständigkeitGene clusterKohlenstoff-14ConcentrateMachinabilityAbundance of the chemical elementsAtomclusterMeeting/Interview
06:10
Chemical reactionChemistryAtomclusterGap junctionGene clusterMeeting/Interview
06:45
AmmoniaStickstoffatomChemical compoundKohlenstoff-14Electronic cigaretteCarbon (fiber)AtomMaterials scienceMeeting/Interview
07:20
Chemical reactionGesundheitsstörungKohlenstoff-14Meeting/Interview
07:55
GemstoneFunctional groupCarbon (fiber)Meeting/Interview
08:30
Kohlenstoff-14Emission spectrumGesundheitsstörungMeeting/Interview
09:05
Carbon (fiber)Diamantähnlicher KohlenstoffChemistryGesundheitsstörungChemistMeeting/Interview
09:40
Chain (unit)AtomKohlenstoff-14ChemistChemical structureErdrutschIonenbindungActive siteCarbon (fiber)Meeting/Interview
10:15
ChemistryReactivity (chemistry)Chemical structureHexagonal crystal systemGraphiteAtomChain (unit)ThermoformingChemical reactionElectronic cigaretteIonenbindungMeeting/Interview
10:50
Hexagonal crystal systemIonenbindungChemical structureKohlenstoff-14Lot <Werkstoff>Meeting/Interview
11:25
Salt domeLibrary (computing)Meeting/Interview
12:00
Chemical reactionChemistryThermoformingMeeting/Interview
12:35
Hexagonal crystal systemLot <Werkstoff>Meeting/Interview
13:10
Lot <Werkstoff>Meeting/Interview
13:45
Hexagonal crystal systemMeeting/Interview
14:20
ChemistryChemical structureHexagonal crystal systemLot <Werkstoff>Meeting/Interview
14:55
Chemical reactionCarbon (fiber)IonenbindungDoppelbindungMeeting/Interview
15:30
Chemical reactionCarbon (fiber)Chemical structureIonenbindungHexagonal crystal systemMeeting/Interview
16:05
ChemistryBlock (periodic table)Meeting/Interview
16:40
ChemistryKohlenstoff-14MoleculeLot <Werkstoff>DoppelbindungMeeting/Interview
17:15
PolyolefinChemical structureDoppelbindungMeeting/Interview
17:50
SchmierstoffErdrutschMeeting/Interview
18:25
MutilationChemistrySecretionMoleculeErdrutschMeeting/Interview
19:00
ChemistryChemistSynthetic oilCalculus (medicine)ErdrutschChemical compoundMeeting/Interview
19:35
MedroxyprogesteroneOrganische ChemieMoleculeSeparation processChemistMeeting/Interview
20:10
PeriodateMeeting/Interview
20:45
ChemistryChemical structureCarbon (fiber)Calculus (medicine)Meeting/Interview
21:20
NeprilysinWine tasting descriptorsSystemic therapySolutionActive siteMeeting/Interview
21:55
ResinErdrutschMeeting/Interview
22:30
ChemistryGraphiteMoleculeWine tasting descriptorsIce sheetHexagonal crystal systemHuman body temperatureEnzymeProcess (computing)WattPolymerMeeting/Interview
23:05
GemstoneEinschlussverbindungenHexagonal crystal systemThermoformingCarbon (fiber)Process (computing)GraphiteKohlenstoff-14ErdrutschCell growthWine tasting descriptorsMeeting/Interview
23:40
ChemistryOrganische ChemieAtomclusterChemical structureMeeting/Interview
24:15
ChemistryErdrutschEinschlussverbindungenChemistMeeting/Interview
24:50
ChemistryIsotropyFunctional groupThermoformingMeeting/Interview
25:25
ChemistryFunctional groupChemical structureMeeting/Interview
26:00
ChemistryChemical reactionSystem on a chipThermoformingErdrutschKohlenstoff-14IsomerFullereneMeeting/Interview
26:35
ChemistryMolecular beamChemistElectronic cigaretteMoleculeAzo couplingMeeting/Interview
27:10
ChemistryLevomethadonNanoparticleNobeliumErdrutschMachinabilityCarbon (fiber)Meeting/Interview
27:45
ChemistrySootAzo couplingCarbon (fiber)MachinabilityInertgasGraphiteMeeting/Interview
28:20
Ene reactionSootContainment buildingMixtureCarbon (fiber)Meeting/Interview
28:55
PedosphäreTolueneFunctional groupErdrutschChemistThin filmMeeting/Interview
29:30
ChemistrySolutionErdrutschTolueneFullereneExciter (effect)Meeting/Interview
30:05
Systemic therapyCarbon nanotubeCobaltExciter (effect)Carbon (fiber)MetalMeeting/Interview
30:40
Chemical reactionBody weightSteelMeeting/Interview
31:15
ChemistryOrlistatCarbon (fiber)DiamondThermoformingKohlenstoff-14Morphology (biology)Meeting/Interview
31:50
Carbon nanotubeCarbon (fiber)ThermoformingMaterials scienceFullereneMorphology (biology)Meeting/Interview
32:25
PharmaceuticsMeeting/Interview
33:00
ChemistryErdrutschProcess (computing)AreaDigoxigeninFed-batch-VerfahrenFullereneSootMeeting/Interview
33:35
MetalElectronOrganische ChemieMeeting/Interview
34:10
NobeliumComputer animation
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
00:15
Good afternoon. I just wanted to tell you the story of how the fullerenes were discovered because it
00:23
was certainly the most fun time I ever had in life, and I like to share it. In the early 1980s, my colleague Richard Smalley invented a machine to study clusters of atoms of very refractory elements.
00:41
The machine's concept was very simple. You took refractory material, impacted the surface of it with a pulse laser light. This would vaporize the material, and the laser would atomize it. And this plume of atoms would be then trained in a stream of helium gas, mixed up with
01:01
the helium, cooled off, and the atoms that you would initially vaporize would come back together and form clusters. And you could add various free agents to this stream of gas so that you could see what would react with the surface of these clusters.
01:22
Then downstream, the gas expanded into a vacuum, into a supersonic jet, was cooled to a few degrees above absolute zero, skimmed into molecular beam, and interrogated with a mass spectrometer. And so one got essentially a distribution of clusters' sizes.
01:44
That is, typically you'd have a big hump where a maximum would correspond to the most abundant clusters. Now, may I have the first slide, please? This is a picture of Rick Smalley atop this machine.
02:03
He's about two meters above the floor. So this was, for physical chemists at least, big science. You could get inside the main chamber of the machine with no difficulty. What he's doing at the moment is introducing a region where air could be excluded so that
02:25
one could ionize clusters with a fluorine laser. May I have the next slide, please? Now, this is what Harry Crota was interested in. What happened was that there was a meeting in Austin, Texas in March of 1984, and Harry
02:46
was there and I was there, and I suggested to Harry that he come visit Rice. He came to Rice and he fell in love with our machine, with Rick's machine. And the reason he fell in love with the machine were these compounds he was interested in.
03:00
His colleague, David Walton, would make compounds like this for him. He would investigate the rotational spectra in a microwave spectrometer he had, determine the rest frequencies, and then go to an observatory, radio astronomy observatory, and try to observe the same rotational transitions in various interstellar clouds.
03:24
And the amazing thing was it found them, because these things are fairly difficult to make in a laboratory. Polyacetylenes are notoriously tricky to work with. It's said that most polyacetylene chemists are missing a few fingers as a result of
03:42
their endeavors. Now, the reason that Harry became enthralled with this machine was that the question is, if this is so hard to make in the laboratory, how does it get made in the interstellar medium? And Harry had the idea that, which he'll tell you about perhaps himself in a minute,
04:02
that material was expelled from the surface of a carbon star. The carbon atoms would get together, make these chains, pick up a hydrogen at one end and a nitrogen at the other, and create the species that he was observing. So, Rick and I and our colleague Frank Tittle were engaged in a program of investigation
04:29
of semiconductor clusters in March of 1984, and we thought we were going to revolutionize the computer business, and we were not too interested in getting off on this sidetrack.
04:40
And it wasn't until August of 1985 that we finally decided there's a break in the action. We'll call Harry and ask him to come over and do his experiments. Next slide, please. And then we looked at the literature, and there was a group at Exxon, Roth and Cox
05:00
and Kaldor, who had already examined carbon clusters in an apparatus identical with the one that we were working with, and had proved that they could make chain-like species in this region that Harry was interested in, in clusters of this size. So we called Harry back and said, looks like this experiment has been done, but if
05:25
you'd like for us to do a few things, we'll do it and send you the data. And Harry's response is, I'm taking the next plane over there, I want to do this myself. So let me tell you a bit about this. This is the kind of data that this machine produced. What we have at the bottom is the number of carbon atoms.
05:44
What we have going up this direction is a scale that tells you the relative number of clusters of a given size. So that in this particular diagram, the carbon-11 cluster has the greatest abundance. Now, this is not at all what a typical cluster diagram looks like.
06:03
Typically, you would just have one single hump. There would be some, as I said, some cluster of maximum concentration or a maximum amount. And this was very peculiar, not at all like this. In this region, you have only odd-numbered clusters.
06:21
In this region, there seems to be some sort of forbidden zone or gap. And in this region, you have only even-numbered clusters. And it's very difficult to come up with an explanation for how you can have only even-numbered clusters. This has never been seen in any other cluster distribution. This also shows various magic numbers, 11, 15, and 19 are magic numbers.
06:43
60, 70, perhaps, are also magic numbers. So, Harry came over. He worked with graduate students, Jim Heath and Sean O'Brien, to do the experiments to show that these carbon chain compounds could be made by vaporizing carbon and mixing
07:04
them with something like ammonia to provide the hydrogen atom for one end and the nitrogen atom for the other. And these experiments worked. You certainly could make these chains, and so the hypothesis seemed quite viable that that's the way that these materials got made for the interstellar medium.
07:23
However, in the course of doing these experiments, the whole distribution was looked at repeatedly under all sorts of conditions. And the relative intensity of the peak corresponding to 60 carbon atoms changed a
07:41
lot depending on what the experimental conditions were. Sometimes it was quite prominent, perhaps maybe eight or nine times higher than its nearest neighbor. And so we reached the stage on a Friday afternoon where Harry was going back, I believe, on Monday, and we had to wrap things up.
08:01
And we said, all right, we have a paper out of finding these chains, but we really ought to think about why this 60 peak fluctuates so much. I remember very clearly that we were sitting in Rick's office, and as a group of five of
08:21
us, we agreed this ought to be done, and then the three professors looked at the two graduate students and said, why don't you work this weekend and see how intense you can make this carbon 60 peak? So may I have the next slide, please? So what happened is that on Monday morning, Jim Heath walked in with this spectrum.
08:43
It's the same sort of thing except we're looking at only the region from 42 to 86 carbon atoms. Again, there are only even-numbered clusters, and Jim Heath had found conditions where this peak was at least 30 times more prominent than its neighbors.
09:02
So clearly you need to come up with an explanation for this. You can't ignore a result like this. It was a result sort of like this one that made us believe that we needed to investigate this further. So the main difference between these panels is that as you go from the bottom towards
09:24
the top, there's been more chance for chemistry to take place in the expansion region inside of the nozzle. And so what we knew about the chemical conditions implied that carbon 60, and to a lesser extent
09:41
carbon 70, was a survivor of chemical attack by carbon atoms. And so one wanted therefore to come up with some unique structure for the 60-carbon atom peak that would reflect this chemical inertness.
10:00
Next, transparency, next slide please. So here are the kinds of things one might work with. We've already seen the chains. The chains typically have a dangling bond at each end, and so this would be a site for chemical reaction, just like the divalent carbon here would be a site for chemical reaction.
10:21
You could get around the chain having a dangling bond at the end if you have a 60-carbon atom chain by making it into a hula hoop. But then there would be no reason to think that a 62-carbon atom hula hoop would be any different in reactivity from a 60-carbon atom hula hoop. The other alternative was to base the structure somehow or another on the structure of graphite.
10:45
Graphite, after all, is the most stable form of carbon, these hexagons with the carbon atoms at the vertices. And you could imagine that somehow or another, if you made up a piece of chicken wire like
11:02
this or hexagons like this, that you could fold it around, curve it around, and have a dangling bond on one side react with a dangling bond on the other side, and perhaps there would be some way of avoiding dangling bonds. Next slide. And there's precedent for this.
11:20
The structures that Buckminster Fuller was so fond of making looked like chicken wire at first glance, looked like hexagons, and they're curved around and they looked like they could ultimately close. And in fact, next slide, some of them, like the expo dome at Montreal, are virtually
11:41
closed globes. Well, there's a little bit of a problem, and that is that Buckminster Fuller didn't tell you how to do this. The Rice Library has perhaps 100 books on the works of Buckminster Fuller, and if you look for those books, it's relatively difficult to find any kind of picture that
12:02
tells you what to do. So there was a famous luncheon at the Mexican restaurant, which Harry can perhaps tell you a bit about in more detail, because I wasn't there. All I know is what I've been told. We're discussing how can we make a closed form of this cage. We've been talking about that.
12:22
And Harry said, well, a few years back, I made a thing out of cardboard to study the constellations. It was about so big, and it was roughly a globe in shape, but it was a polyhedron. It was made up of hexagons and I think pentagons, and it might have had 60 vertices.
12:46
And so what happens in these discussions is everybody says, hmm, that's very interesting and changes the subject, and that's what happened on this occasion. But people don't forget these things. And this was around one o'clock in the afternoon perhaps when this came up, and this
13:05
began to gnaw on Harry during the afternoon, and by a little bit after dinner time, I think around 6.30 or 7, he really wanted to see this great thing he had made, and he wanted to count the vertices on it to see if it had 60 vertices.
13:22
And so he came to me and he said, I want to call my wife, Laura, who's here today, and get her to get this thing out and count the vertices. And I said, Harriet's what, 2.30 in the morning in Brighton?
13:42
I don't know. And then I asked him the killing question, Harriet, do you know where it is? Well, it's been a while since I've seen it. And so I said, it could wait till morning. You know, what the heck, why wake her up in the middle of the night to find this
14:00
thing and count the vertices? Many wives would not appreciate this. So Harry agreed with me it could wait till morning, but it couldn't wait till morning because Rick hadn't forgotten about the idea that this thing was made of hexagons and maybe pentagons. So he went home and he cut out a bunch of hexagons out of paper, and he cut some
14:24
pentagons with the same length edges out of paper, and he tried to put them together and to make some closed structure with 60 vertices. And from what he tells me, once he started working with pentagons, it turned out to be trivial. You start with one pentagon and you put five hexagons around it and you already
14:44
have a bowl-shaped object. And so the next morning, he lived at that time far away from Rice, the next morning he called me and said, I'm on my way to work, get everybody together in my office, I found the solution. Next slide, please.
15:01
And he came in and he threw this object on the table in the office, and of course, none of us bothered to count the vertices. We knew it had 60 vertices, or he wouldn't have come in claiming that this was a solution. But I'm always one not to give up too easily, so I said, well, we really got to see
15:23
if the bonding of carbon works out. And so we pasted these little pieces of extra paper that had double bonds on them to see if we started out making the number of bonds from each carbon be four on one side. If when we got around to the other side, it would work out.
15:41
There would still be, there would be no carbons with either three bonds or five bonds. And it worked out, and so I said, oh, I believe this must be the right structure. So we called the chairman of the math department at Rice, we didn't know what this was, and said we've got this object that's got 20 hexagons and 12 pentagons, 60 vertices,
16:04
what is it? He said, well, let me look it up, and I'm sure I can find out the answer. And in about five minutes, he called back, and I happened to be the one that picked up the phone, and he said, what you've got there is a soccer ball.
16:22
And I was somewhat taken aback by this comment, and I pretended, you know, how you'd try to somehow or another shift your ground a bit, I said, well, what's this technical name? You know, like I knew it was a soccer ball on the block. And he said, well, it's a truncated icosahedron, and you guys haven't discovered anything new.
16:44
We mathematicians have known about this for quite a while. So anyway, we got the computer model made, next slide, please, of this molecule. This is what it is with the bonding, of course, the carbon atoms at the vertices.
17:03
This particular calculate structure, that is, you could move the double bonds around in many different ways, actually 12,500 different ways, but the ones for all of the double bonds are only in the pentagon. There's only one structure where the double bonds are only in the hexagons, and no double
17:22
bonds are in the pentagon, and that is by far the dominant structure. So this particular material, it was discovered sometime later, reacts like a polyolefin and not like an aromatic compound, as it looks. This looks like benzene, but it really isn't benzene. So we wrote a paper for Nature, a letter to Nature, and we claimed that this new material
17:47
that no one had ever thought of before would be wonderful, it would do all sorts of things. It would be the carrier, the diffuse interstellar bands, it would be a wonderful lubricant. I don't think we claimed it would cure the common cold, but we quivered on the edge
18:00
of doing that. And we sent the paper off to Nature, and we were really happy, next slide please. And we had our team photo made. This is Sean O'Brien, and this is Jim Heath, and you've met the other characters in this play. This is our mystery woman. No good story, every good story needs a mystery woman.
18:21
We still don't know who she is. Anyway, we were very happy about this. We finally found, next slide please, how Buckminster Fuller made domes. He put pentagons in them, by golly. So this is a picture of Buckminster Fuller revealing his secret.
18:44
Now, as I said, we thought we were the first people to ever think of this. Next slide. But we weren't. Isiozawa in Japan had thought of this molecule in 1971 by the simple expedient of taking a close look at a soccer ball that his son was playing with.
19:05
And apparently, this was, the idea of this compound was really quite well known to a large number of chemists. For example, the Russians had done a Hickel theoretical calculation on it. Next slide please.
19:22
And the synthetic organic chemist Orville Chapman, who's at UCLA, had looked around for a suitable target for his considerable synthetic organic skills, asked himself supposedly this question, if God would give me the grace to make one molecule, what would that molecule be, and answered his own question with soccer ball C60.
19:45
And this was around 1980. He went further than that. He wrote a proposal to the National Science Foundation in the United States. It was funded to make the soccer ball C60, and he set to work with several graduate students to make it. And unfortunately, he was not able to make it.
20:03
No organic chemist has synthesized this molecule by the traditional methods of organic chemistry, at least so far. Now, in this period of time, when we were discovering that, hey, this isn't such a revolutionary new idea after all, things were very interesting because Harry had gone
20:22
back to England, and we were in the United States, and so we sent out a lot of reprints or preprints of our paper, and we began to get information back, and we were getting slightly different information that us in Houston and Harry in Sussex that were pointing
20:41
in the same direction. What we got was a preprint of a paper by Tony Heyman, who had considered once again done this theoretical calculation on soccer ball C60. This was actually the third time it was published, but no one knew that. But he had in his paper a lot of thoughts that have not been sufficiently appreciated.
21:05
One thought that he had, one thing that he showed was he considered an alternative closed cage structure for carbon 60 and concluded that it wouldn't be a good structure because it had five-membered rings that were bonded together, and he thought this
21:23
would be a high energy, possibly chemically reactive site. The other thing that he knew was that Euler had in about 1764 explained the rules for how you make polyhedra, and when these rules were applied to a system that contained
21:41
only six-membered rings and five-membered rings, what it said was that as long as you had 24 or more even number of atoms, you could make a closed cage solution which would have exactly 12 pentagons in it and the rest would be hexagons. Now what Harry was getting, next slide please, was somebody pointed out this beautiful little
22:06
article by David Jones which was published in 1966 saying David Jones had a column for the New Scientist where he essentially said crazy ideas that I've had about chemistry,
22:22
and he published under the name of Daedalus because I guess he didn't want people to think he was crazy for having crazy ideas. He says Daedalus has conceived a hollow molecule, a closed spherical shell of sheet polymer graphite whose molecules are flat sheets of enzyme hexagons. He proposes to modify the high temperature graphite process by
22:41
introducing suitable impurities into the sheets to work them, reasoning that it will ultimately close them itself. And almost immediately people told him the suitable impurities ought to be five-membered rings and you need exactly 12 of them. And essentially
23:00
what we discovered was you didn't really have to do much to modify the high temperature graphite process. All you had to do was let carbon condense, carbon atoms condense from a high temperature, and you would spontaneously make this closed cage compound. Next slide please. And he had, in some of his subsequent work, he had some pictures of this beautiful
23:27
radiolara animals which have skeletons that are made of hexagons and pentagons primarily, although if you look carefully you can see some heptagons in there. And this picture comes out of a book by Darcy Thompson on growth and form. Darcy Thompson had considered
23:44
the relationship between geometry and symmetry and the structure of organisms. For example, we have bilateral symmetry, a starfish has five-fold symmetry, and these little animals have sort of spherical symmetry. And so this turns out to be in some ways related to biology.
24:04
Next slide please. So this led us back to this distribution and the thought that perhaps the reason that there are only even clusters here is because all of these clusters are
24:20
closed cage compounds. That they've already been subjected to considerable chemical attack and only the ones that were already closed cages survived. Next slide please. Well, that makes it a little hard because if these are all closed cages, why are they reacting
24:41
away? And there is something unique about carbon-60. It's the smallest cage compound that has no adjacent pentagons in it. And so almost simultaneously Harry and quite independently
25:00
the group at Galveston, Tom Schmalz and Doug Klein and Bill Seitz reasoned that maybe the five-membered rings that are adjacent to each other are particularly susceptible to chemical attack. And maybe what's going on here is that C-70 is the next smallest
25:22
closed polyhedral form that has no adjacent pentagons. Now it turns out to prove this as a formidable challenge, and in fact the group at Galveston who are quite talented mathematicians finally proved it in about 1993. But it's like this is the only one
25:43
that you can make a non-adjacent pentagon structure for easily. Harry tried to make some in this region and never could succeed and was forced essentially to guess. And it is true that this is the next one that has no adjacent pentagons. Next slide please. So what's happening? Here's a C-40. What's happening is if you have a pair
26:06
of pentagons that are adjacent, these two particular carbon atoms that bridge the two pentagons are particularly susceptible to chemical attack, and no fullerene has ever been isolated which had adjacent pentagons. Next slide please. Now there are many different
26:24
isomers. Once you get up in the neighborhood of C-60, there are 1812 closed cage forms of C-60. And this is all but one of the isomers. The soccer ball isomer has adjacent pentagons in it. This is just one of them. Well, we had a lot of fun in 1985. Almost
26:45
all the ideas that we had were on the table by the end of 1985. We spent a couple of years defending ourselves and trying to do new experiments to test the fullerene hypothesis. By about 1988 or 89, we were running out of gas. You go to give a talk,
27:04
the organic chemist would say, let's see your vial of substance and we'd say, we don't have it. We just have a few molecules in a molecular beam. And it was clear there was no Nobel Prize in what we'd done. And we couldn't figure out what to do next.
27:21
Next slide please. And these two guys came to our rescue. This is Wolfgang Krejtschmer from Heidelberg and this is Don Huffman from the University of Arizona at Tucson. They are physicists who have been interested in carbon particles in space for a long time.
27:40
And next slide please. They had a machine for making carbon, essentially for making carbon soot and then looking at it. And this machine consisted of a couple of graphite rods that you ran a current through, heated up the graphite, vaporized the carbon and then they had a little disk that they put above it to collect the soot on it. And
28:02
they had some peculiar soot and they wondered what was going on. They usually had an inert atmosphere in here. They wondered what was going on with this peculiar soot and after kidding each other around for years, they finally decided, well maybe it really is C60, maybe we ought to look for it. And sure enough, they discovered that
28:21
if you had about half an atmosphere of argon in this bell jar and collected soot here, that soot was about 5% a mixture of C60 and C70. And so people around the world started, this was in essentially August of 1990, September of 1990, people around the world
28:44
started vaporizing carbon rods and collecting the soot from inside the container. You notice it doesn't land just here, it lands everywhere on the inside of the container. And so most of the research groups looked kind of like this. Next slide please. It was a nasty work.
29:05
And scraping the soot out and shaking it up and dissolving the C60 and the C70 out of it. Next slide please. Once the chemists knew how they could get this material
29:20
out, then they separated this material and actually Harry's proof was one of the first groups to separate the material. This is C60 in a toluene solution. This is a thin film of C60. This is C70, pure C70 in a toluene solution and C84 in a toluene solution.
29:41
And so there are about, I don't know, perhaps eight or nine different pure fullerenes that have been isolated. And there was a tremendous amount of excitement and a very large number of papers that came out in the year right after 1990 as people worked on this. And so
30:01
where do we stand today? May I have the next slide please? Well, first of all, there's this material has come out since about 1992. If you add, this is a fullerene that's been elongated and is only capped with pentagons on one end. If you do your vaporization
30:22
of carbon and add a little bit of metallic iron, cobalt or nickel, particularly nickel, to the system, the catalyst takes over the system and converts all the fullerene production into the production of these carbon nanotubes, bucky tubes. And a lot of the current excitement
30:44
is can we do something with these bucky tubes? I mean, for example, if you could take millions or billions of them and put them together into a cable all parallel to each other, you would have the strongest cable imaginable. Perhaps a hundred times stronger
31:00
than steel at perhaps a quarter of the weight for the same cross-section. Unfortunately, no one knows how to do that. But the effort to make something out of this material, also the material is electrically conducting, so you would have electrically conducting extremely strong cable. So, just recently, people have wondered whatever became of lucky
31:24
ball. Next slide, please. This is what we have. I've got my slide out. I apologize. This is what we have come out of this in terms of the morphology of carbon. We started out with diamond as a three-dimensional network of carbon atoms. So this is basically a three-dimensional
31:45
material. One other form of carbon is graphite, which is basically a two-dimensional material, these sheets of six-membered rings. Then the nanotubes are one-dimensional materials
32:00
and the bucky balls would correspond to a zero-dimensional material. So, one of the things that's come out of this is that we can think of carbon as satisfying virtually all forms, in one form or another, satisfying virtually all morphologies that are possible in three-dimensional space. Next slide, please. So this is what I thought was coming
32:24
up. In the May 4th, 1998 Wall Street Journal, this question was asked by Susan Warren and the obvious answer is no commercial product has been made out of lucky balls.
32:42
And her reasoning was that it cost too much, $11,000 a pound for C60. Same to put it outside the scope of something that would be useful, even though the highest utility material pharmaceuticals have to cost less than $2,500 a pound. I don't think this is actually
33:02
the reason. It is true that it's hard to scale up the manufacture of C60 because of this basic, the fundamental batch nature of the process and digging in there and getting the soot out. But no one has come up with this killer application that's going to be some great commercial value and therefore there's been no reason to drive this price
33:24
down. Now, next slide please. That's not because people aren't trying. There's areas of research or producing fullerenes, particularly endohedral metallofullerenes, fullerenes with metals inside. There's a lot of work on the organic chemistry of fullerenes, efforts
33:42
to find applications in biology and medicine, efforts to find applications in optics and electronic devices, but no one, as far as I know, has come up with that practical application that we're all thinking of. So, in the words of Rick Smalley, we all wonder whether the kid will ever get a job. Thank you.
Recommendations
Series of 9 media