Hello everybody, I'm Stefania Lombardi, Isti, CNR and PhD in moral philosophy. My title is publishing re-literature in the digital century. It's the same title of the core itself. Why?

When I read publishing re-literature in the digital century, I wondered what it means. We live in a digital century, so what are the implications of publishing re-literature in our century? Being our century digital, very big steps were done in few decades. So, I wonder and remember what the digital century really is, what re-literature really is and what publishing itself really is.

Only when these concepts are clear to all of us, we can analyse the keywords in the digital century. Access, for example, is a keyword. What does access mean?

For instance, access is the keyword to on-agenda 2020 recommendations and so summarised, no one will be left behind.

Instead, in the open science field, open access to scientific publications means to guarantee access to scientific publications to all the public and it is becoming more and more important. So, more and more initiatives were conducted regarding access. Is it enough? No.

Access is the basis. We need to measure usability and more compression.

Publishing re-literature in the digital century means the chance to be more and more known thanks to this enlargement of access. If this chance will come true, we need to invest in usability. Please remember the keywords.

Access, what we have already done. Usability, what we have to do. One of the ways we can do that is the engagement in citizen science projects. It means great literature must exit from a citizen group.

It means to become more and more open to a wider public and closer to people. Publishing re-literature in the digital century means to take more and more care of people. By investing in usability, we can reach the next step.

Comprehension. Please remember the keywords. Access, what we have already done. Usability, what we have to do before compression. Comprehension, what we have to do. So, what we can do? Maybe we can do some proposals.

First of all, to launch some calls for projects regarding re-literature in citizen science. Then, fourth, usability.

Second, to launch Flintang groups, which will examine the above projects' outputs to analyze the quality of compression, if any. These proposals are some ways to explore the chance our digital century could give to re-literature. To let re-literature be more and more known.

So, this is what I mean when I wonder about publishing re-literature in the digital century. Thank you and bye bye.