We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Plone from the perspective of Orchard Core

Formal Metadata

Title
Plone from the perspective of Orchard Core
Title of Series
Number of Parts
53
Author
Contributors
License
CC Attribution 3.0 Germany:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
I'm currently working with the Orchard CMS. It addresses many of the same issues as Plone: flexible content type definitions, workflow, fully customisable layout and theming, third-party module development, all with a strong through-the-web story. In many cases, I find the Orchard solutions form an interesting contrast to the Plone way, specifically in terms of content type definition, widgets, templating and layout. I'd like to look at Orchard from a Plone point of view: what is easier, what is lacking, what lessons can we take from another player in the same space. I will be looking at Orchard Core, the fully cross-platform rewrite that is in beta now. It uses a .NET document database working on any RDBMS (we use postgres and sqlite). Orchard is an open source (BSD 3-Clause) project, .Net, C#, started around 2009.