We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Two different approaches to building a distribution: OpenHarmony and OpenMandriva

Formal Metadata

Title
Two different approaches to building a distribution: OpenHarmony and OpenMandriva
Subtitle
An overview of very different ideas - from someone involved in both projects
Title of Series
Number of Parts
637
Author
License
CC Attribution 2.0 Belgium:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
There are many Linux distributions out there - and almost as many different approaches to how they're built. Two distributions on nearly opposite ends of the spectrum include OpenMandriva (which uses binary packages, builds and updates each package individually, applications are part of the OS, ...) and OpenHarmony (which builds the OS from source in one go, is updated through OTA images, and treats applications as something separate, ...) A developer involved in both projects explains how the 2 projects go about building their respective OSes, why both projects made the choices they made, how the approaches differ from a developer and user perspective, and what approach works better for what particular use case.