We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Free/Open source Research Software production at the Gaspard-Monge Computer Science laboratory (LIGM)

Formal Metadata

Title
Free/Open source Research Software production at the Gaspard-Monge Computer Science laboratory (LIGM)
Subtitle
Lessons learnt
Title of Series
Number of Parts
637
Author
License
CC Attribution 2.0 Belgium:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
In this talk we present the experience of the software produced, as part of the research activities, at the French Gaspard-Monge Computer Science laboratory (Laboratoire d'informatique Gaspard-Monge or LIGM in French). The LIGM has an important production of research software with 66 software items identified for the period 2013-18, where 50 have been disseminated as FOSS. Since 2006, the Lab has worked in order to improve the dissemination and the visibility conditions of this research production [1], which includes the adoption of policies and the production and maintenance of a catalogue. In this context, one of the first issues we had to deal with was the concept of the Lab's software, in order to answer the questions of the researchers. The second concept was the identification or reference (or citation form) of such objects. The concept of "Logiciel d'un laboratoire" [1,2] initially proposed in 2006 has since then evolved to become research software ("Logiciel de la recherche") and it is a central concept in order to propose services and infrastructures to deal with this production in the current Open Science global context evolution [3,4], where the goals are to make it visible, accessible, reusable. It is also a central concept in order to propose research evaluation procedures related to this scientific output [5].