We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Making Open Science Sustainable for Chemistry

Formal Metadata

Title
Making Open Science Sustainable for Chemistry
Title of Series
Number of Parts
9
Author
License
CC Attribution - NoDerivatives 4.0 International:
You are free to use, copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
Interview with Ian Bruno: Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, UK, recorded at the BEILSTEIN OPEN SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (22 – 24 May 2017). Ian Bruno is discussing making open science sustainable with Martin Hicks. Ian makes the point that simply making data sets available is not sufficient, they need to be discoverable and re-usable. He outlines how the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) started producing the Cambridge Structure Database over 50 years ago, and over time have had different models to ensure its sustainability. In the internet era, the challenge has been to provide a level of free access, whilst generating income through the value added services and software that work on top of the database. Sustainability is not just an issue of financial support, but is also driven by the user base. Here the CCDC set up a network of national affiliated centers, responsible originally for the distribution of the database – then on tapes. Nowadays this network helps in attracting funding for local academics to receive the value added services. The driver of sustainability of a resource is its scientific value. Ian discussed the idea of the scholarly commons and different ways of communicating science, in particular looking at the underlying research objects that contribute to a story. To improve discoverability we need to address the issues of publish and perish paradigm, and develop workflows that are much more closely related to the research that people are doing. Here we need the appropriate levels of documentation or meta-data associated with those research objects so that people are able to find them. In terms of standards for chemical structures, Ian notes that people are currently using de-facto standards and have built workflows around them, and thus they will be reluctant to change. There are currently discussions underway, to ensure that the specification of these formats and extensions are made openly accessible.
Keywords