We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

The Moral Hazard Argument

00:00

Formal Metadata

Title
The Moral Hazard Argument
Title of Series
Number of Parts
46
Author
License
CC Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 3.0 Germany:
You are free to use, copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
The term Climate Engineering (CE) specifically describes large-scale technical methods that can be used to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere or to reduce incoming solar radiation. Recently, some scientists and politicians have begun discussing the possibility of using CE to deal with climate change.
24
33
Thumbnail
00:54
45
Thumbnail
00:57
Meeting/Interview
Meeting/Interview
Meeting/Interview
Meeting/Interview
Meeting/Interview
Meeting/Interview
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
What the moral hazard argument actually is saying is that our efforts in research and climate engineering will hinder mitigation efforts. But since we want to do mitigation, since mitigation is the policy choice, anything that hinders mitigation efforts is not morally permissible. I think to some
extent the moral hazard really is imminent, it's really happening because some lobbyist groups or whatever that have an interest that the economy as it is right now will continue the way it is now. For them it is of course great to have this research and the more research we are doing the more we show that it is feasible and I mean really climate engineering will be
feasible, it will offset climate change like the solar radiation management will reflect the sunbeams back into space so we will have cooling of the earth so it is working in this respect of course there are loads of other respects to it but as soon as we see that it is working that it is
offsetting the temperature rise on the globe then people might think yeah then well let's do it instead of getting rid of all our cars for example.