We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Resurgence’s two Main Types and Their Signature Complications: Tessellation, Isography, Autarchy

Formal Metadata

Title
Resurgence’s two Main Types and Their Signature Complications: Tessellation, Isography, Autarchy
Title of Series
Number of Parts
20
Author
Contributors
License
CC Attribution 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
Resurgence’s two Main Types and Their Signature Complications: Tessellation, Isography, Autarchy Quite specific challenges attend the move from equational resurgence (i.e. resurgence in a singular variable –the main type in frequency and importance) to coequational resurgence (i.e. resurgence in a singular parameter –a close second, roughly dual to the first): complexity soars; two Bridge equations are required instead of one; the complex valued Stokes constants make way for discrete tessellation coefficients; the acting alien algebra remains isomorphic to an algebra of ordinary differential operators, but these are now subject to isographic invariance (meaning that they annihilate some specific differential two-form); and lastly, the new resurgence coefficients possess the paradoxical property of autarchy, combining sectorial resurgence with global entireness. We shall attempt a comprehensive, up-to-date survey of the field, with emphasis on the rather unexpected and quite novel structures spawned by these two regimes of resurgence.
Keywords