Topography of Nature
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Formal Metadata
Title |
| |
Author | ||
Contributors | ||
License | CC Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 3.0 Germany: You are free to use, copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor. | |
Identifiers | 10.5446/4453 (DOI) | |
Publisher | ||
Release Date | ||
Language | ||
Producer | ||
Production Year | 2011 | |
Production Place | Ratisbon |
Content Metadata
Subject Area | |||||
Genre | |||||
Abstract |
| ||||
Keywords |
|
00:20
Meeting/Interview
00:33
TypesettingFinger protocolMaterialMeeting/Interview
00:53
Meeting/Interview
01:02
Meeting/Interview
01:13
Meeting/Interview
01:23
Material
01:28
Meeting/Interview
01:41
Typesetting
01:48
Typesetting
02:08
PrintingTypesettingHot workingMeeting/Interview
02:19
Station wagon
02:25
Meeting/Interview
02:41
Finger protocolMeeting/Interview
03:17
Meeting/Interview
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
00:20
My name is Martin Knoll. I am assistant professor for modern history at Technische Universität Darmstadt in Germany and I'm alumni fellow at the Rachel Carson Center. The title of my project is Topographies of nature, the nature of topographies. It deals with
00:41
environmental perception and the creation of environmental knowledge in early modern topographical literature. My approach to this type of literature is the approach of an environmental historian with a cultural history background. The text and the images are
01:01
presenting a certain image of the world, of the region they describe, of the city they describe and most of the time they do not describe the city, the nature of the landscape. They describe some some kind of
01:22
nexuses between societal practices and materiality around them and within this framework there are different priorizations possible and one question is what role does nature play within these
01:43
priority settings? One way to answer this question for me was to study editorial processes and in comparing the archival records documenting what was there and what was published afterwards
02:04
showed me a bit about what type of nature dropped, what type of nature didn't occur in the finally published media and this is a very important point.
02:22
Early modern societies have been organized in a very static way, in a very hierarchical way and obviously topographical descriptions of a country, of its economy, of its agriculture, should represent something like good order and
02:43
nature when in its typical dynamic disturbed disorder, these are points that were left out. Nature as fluvial dynamics, nature as bad climatic conditions,
03:05
nature limiting the productivity of land use, all these informations were quite likely to get left out. The way nature, the way society, the way
03:21
socio-natural sites were depicted in historical topography can be clearly understood as a construction, as an image of the way society should be, the way a society wanted to be seen.