CANNABIS VILLAGE - Open Cannabis Project: Cannabis + Open Source

Video thumbnail (Frame 0) Video thumbnail (Frame 3916) Video thumbnail (Frame 5127) Video thumbnail (Frame 6059) Video thumbnail (Frame 7552) Video thumbnail (Frame 8413) Video thumbnail (Frame 9525) Video thumbnail (Frame 11521) Video thumbnail (Frame 16053) Video thumbnail (Frame 20859) Video thumbnail (Frame 22799) Video thumbnail (Frame 24388) Video thumbnail (Frame 27552) Video thumbnail (Frame 30445) Video thumbnail (Frame 32473) Video thumbnail (Frame 33369) Video thumbnail (Frame 34642) Video thumbnail (Frame 35830) Video thumbnail (Frame 37234) Video thumbnail (Frame 39110) Video thumbnail (Frame 47501) Video thumbnail (Frame 55892) Video thumbnail (Frame 62705)
Video in TIB AV-Portal: CANNABIS VILLAGE - Open Cannabis Project: Cannabis + Open Source

Formal Metadata

Title
CANNABIS VILLAGE - Open Cannabis Project: Cannabis + Open Source
Title of Series
Author
License
CC Attribution 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
2018
Language
English

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Abstract
The Open Cannabis Project is a community-led, research-driven non-profit with a simple mission: to defend the richness and diversity of cannabis from illegitimate and overreaching patents. To fulfill this mission, we are building a transparent and open source repository of data about cannabis genetics, chemistry, and traits. In addition to documenting plants that already exist in the public domain, such a robust data set can also provide a unique lens into cannabis en masse, allowing us to gain an understanding of this variable little plant in a way weve never before been able to see.
Process (computing) Hacker (term) Open source Representation (politics) Bit
Building Presentation of a group Open source Multiplication sign 1 (number) Open set Mathematical morphology Attribute grammar Hacker (term) Energy level Information Observational study Information Mapping Building Projective plane Open source Electronic mailing list Attribute grammar Bit Set (mathematics) Open set Word Data management Process (computing) File archiver Block (periodic table)
Degree (graph theory) Physical law
Presentation of a group Multiplication sign Quicksort Plastikkarte Fiber (mathematics) Form (programming) Row (database)
Mixture model Scheduling (computing) Regulator gene Bit Quicksort Series (mathematics) Mereology Event horizon Metropolitan area network
Architecture Category of being Presentation of a group Software Projective plane Physical law Musical ensemble Bit Category of being Neuroinformatik
Windows Registry Presentation of a group Scheduling (computing) Identifiability Open source Public domain Image registration Mereology Computer programming Architecture Different (Kate Ryan album) Hybrid computer Software Musical ensemble Category of being Computer architecture Exception handling Form (programming) Area Variety (linguistics) Physical law Mereology Limit (category theory) Category of being Type theory Word Software Hybrid computer Utility software Self-organization Quicksort Plant variety (law)
Context awareness Virtual machine Materialization (paranormal) Similarity (geometry) Public domain Attribute grammar Inclusion map Different (Kate Ryan album) Hybrid computer Cloning Utility software Process (computing) Covering space Dot product Variety (linguistics) Expression Public domain Mereology Virtual machine Type theory Process (computing) Integrated development environment Personal digital assistant Utility software Right angle Natural language Plant variety (law)
Covering space Information Physical law Maxima and minima Public domain Mereology Cartesian coordinate system Subset Revision control Process (computing) Personal digital assistant Office suite Series (mathematics) Quicksort Descriptive statistics Window Row (database)
Latent heat Component-based software engineering Profil (magazine) Hybrid computer Content (media) Utility software Cloning Series (mathematics)
Component-based software engineering Different (Kate Ryan album) Natural number Variety (linguistics) Weight Combinational logic ACID Utility software Liquid Series (mathematics) Set (mathematics) Number
Computer icon Game controller Computer file Variety (linguistics) Multiplication sign Computer file Combinational logic Public domain Bit Public domain Mereology Cartesian coordinate system Mathematics Maize Spherical cap Software Personal digital assistant Right angle Software framework Physical system Physical system
Degree (graph theory) Category of being Process (computing) Software developer
Exterior algebra Inheritance (object-oriented programming) Different (Kate Ryan album) Video game Bit Whiteboard Game theory Entire function Physical system
Building Information Software Open source Interior (topology) Multiplication sign Projective plane Public domain Cartesian coordinate system Mereology Declarative programming Physical system
Building Context awareness Open source State of matter Combinational logic Database Data storage device Open set Heat transfer Mereology Newsletter Prototype Hacker (term) Computer configuration Formal verification Data conversion Traffic reporting Information security Metropolitan area network Physical system Self-organization Noise (electronics) Moment (mathematics) Open source Heat transfer Database Set (mathematics) Flow separation Open set Degree (graph theory) Word Computer configuration Personal digital assistant Universe (mathematics) Chain Right angle Quicksort Whiteboard Electronic visual display Information security Physical system
Scheduling (computing) State of matter Similarity (geometry) Branch (computer science) Open set Parameter (computer programming) Mass Disk read-and-write head Computer programming Number Wave packet Product (business) Goodness of fit Mathematics Different (Kate Ryan album) Term (mathematics) Operator (mathematics) Touch typing Office suite Standard deviation Projective plane Expression Open source Fitness function System call Degree (graph theory) Subject indexing Process (computing) Computer configuration Personal digital assistant Right angle Natural language Quicksort Musical ensemble Information security Freeware Resultant
Computer configuration Open source Hidden Markov model Plastikkarte Information security
hello DEFCON how are you good yes all right before I get started on any of these talks I like to sort of like get to know my audience a little bit any lawyers in the room do we have any legal representatives okay that makes my job easier and harder in some ways also how many of you in here would describe yourself as a hacker yeh this the most hackers I've ever been in one room with excited besides for like being out there that's great cool well I'll get started today my name is Beth
Schecter and I'm we're gonna talk about the open cannabis project which is a nonprofit that I'm running to give you a little bit of an overview we'll start out with some introductions and disclaimers a little brief history of cannabis prohibition although if you were just here for the previous presentation there's a lot more information to learn and I won't be going over all of it we'll talk a little bit about the problematic land of cannabis patents how open source data can help solve some of those problems what we're building and then I'm really hoping to use a good chunk of this time for discussion with all of you we have some questions about you know some ideas that we have moving forward and we'd love to hear your thoughts so to get started let me tell you a little bit about open cannabis project which we call OCP because open cannabis project is a lot of words to say over and over again it was founded back in 2015 by dr. Magli Holmes who is a geneticist at Philo's bioscience and Jeremy plum who is a renowned cultivator grower cannabis enthusiast and if you is one of those people that if you ever get to him talking on cannabis science you will feel like you are drinking from a firehose he's amazing and their goal was to create a comprehensive archive of every exists in cannabis cultivar which is the word that we use for you know strain strain is something that's used for bacteria and cultivars what we use in botany and in its attributes so it's chemical levels it's you know maybe potentially it's morphology that kind of thing and the primary purpose is to block over broad patents claiming owner to ship over previously existing strains namely the ones that we have been growing for and as a bonus and the thing that really makes me excited as someone who comes from the open data world we can create a giant open data set of cannabis chemical and genetic data that can be used by anyone wishing to study the plant and given the amount of things that we're learning about the plant and the lack of and the the abundance of misinformation that's out there when you go to a dispensary this is something that would be really useful to I think everyone so
a little bit about me I like I said I'm the executive director I came in - I'm really new to cannabis I've been in the industry for about a year I come from the world of open information and data and community education and design I'm a bit of a nerd I'm the kind of nerd that really likes making open-source maps and I liked it so much that I ended up accidentally starting another nonprofit called map time which literally just got people together to learn about making maps using open-source data set so Open Street Map data that kind of thing my other past jobs have included things like technical writer curriculum writer education and outreach manager but you'll notice that lawyer and hacker are two things that are not on that list so you these are important things to keep in mind for the rest of the presentation because we're gonna talk
about law but I am NOT a lawyer and this is not legal advice my lawyers tell me to say these things these are my lawyers
they are really and so if you actually do want legal advice I highly recommend you reach out to them Dale hunt is an IP lawyer and botanist out of San Diego and John Mansfield is based out of Portland Oregon where I am and both of them John I'm sorry Dale especially if you ask him but anything related to plants and patents he will give you such thorough explanations and I feel like I've gotten like a little mini law degree even though again not a lawyer so before we
get started I want to also go over a little brief history of cannabis prohibition humans and cannabis have had
an 8,000 year history we have been having some sort of relationship with this plant using it either as a fiber or some form of medicine and weed came to
what's now the u.s. a really long time ago along with the colonists who came this way actually no even before that but it
definitely made its way into the colonial United States and you know in the 1600s there are records of people growing hemp in the late 1890s you know cannabis was used as a as a tincture as a pharmaceutical you could even get yourself some hashish candy that kind of thing I've seen some anecdotal evidence actually we talked about it in the preview of the previous presentations today that cannabis was also considered to be a treatment for opium addiction a long time ago and then again now some
edits are needed on sort of the previous part now that I've learned a little bit more about mr. Anslinger who has taken a lot of the credit for the beginning of cannabis prohibition maybe it sounds like maybe he wasn't the one fully behind it but suffice to say a series of events in the 1930s brought about cannabis prohibition and it got scheduled along with heroin as a Schedule one narcotic and since then we've seen just like tons of prohibition that's anti cannabis and from reefer madness all the way to Nancy Reagan and her wonderful just say no campaign and
now you know thanks to organizations like normal we have this sort of like mixture of cannabis regulation speckled nests in the United States all still sort of stilt all of its tilted by this schedule one classification and then there's Jeff Sessions just you know making making us sad making a sad face about everything I know man he's got some healing to do and can probably use a lot more CBD alright so what's the
deal with cannabis and patents and to be fair I came into this project not really knowing much about it at all and so I'm gonna give you a little bit of a brief overview of how this works so that you can sort of follow along because it's not the most straightforward thing so us
intellectual property law has three main
hoops come back I broke it
you guys I broke the presentation
out did I turn it off yeah is there a computer there we go okay great I will
stay away from the courts all right so US intellectual property law has three primary categories there's patents which are limited duration property rights related to an invention in exchange for public disclosure of that invention which becomes useful once that patent expires there's a trademark which covers words and phrases basically or logos anything that will be used to identify something in trade or commerce and then there's copyright which protects original works of authorship including musical and artistic works software and architecture a lot of when we're talking about later in the presentation about open source principles a lot of this comes more from copyright law which is part of why it's interesting applying to patents but we'll talk about that later but in general these are the three sort of areas of intellectual of intellectual property law and we are primarily as an organization focusing on patents for cannabis any patents for cannabis fall
under IP protection that are available for plants in the United States and there are you know four main ways right now that plants are protected that our plants are protectable under intellectual property law one is through the plant Patent Act I also have 1930 a lot of stuff apparently happened in the 1930s and it protects a sexually produced plant varieties which are not tubers tubers like potatoes since they do reproduce asexually and they're not covered under this act they are covered however under the plant variety Protection Act of 1970 which protects actually reproduced by seed or tuber propagated plant varieties except for fungi or bacteria basically the difference well a couple differences between the plant patent backs and the PVPA the plant patent backed is really applies to patents for cannabis the plant variety Protection Act is another form of federal registration that does grant you intellectual property protection but it's not exactly a patent the patent Act covers basically anything that can be patented under US law and there's a type of patent called utility patents which are really what you think of when you typically think of a patent for anything and those can be granted for plant seeds plant varieties plant parts processes plant genes hybrids when you think about for example when I say plants and patents how many of you think of Monsanto like immediately right okay so most this is most people's primer sort of into this weird world so you know a Monsanto patent is typically a utility patent and it's something that can be much broader than say a plant patent or something under the plant variety Protection Act you can also use trade secrets and licensing as a way to grant intellectual property protection for your plants under trade secrets though because you haven't disclosed things publicly if somebody else grows something really similar to you just because you have protected that invention and kept it out of the public domain somebody else can still get a patent for it so it's kind of weird you'd think that like protecting your invention and keeping or like keeping your invention really secret would keep someone else from patenting it but that's actually not true so when it comes to cannabis all of these things still apply with the exception of the plant variety Protection Act which is kind of a bummer and that is true because this program is managed by the USDA and not the the PTO which is the Patent and Trademark Office and the PVPA there I'm sorry there's seed registries which is basically to get a plant variety protection you submit a bunch of seeds and the seeds get put into basically a seed holding facility and the seed holding facilities will not take cannabis seeds because it is a Schedule one drug so that kind of eliminates that as the opportunity for
it in other countries is also worth mentioning the plant variety Protection
Act is also known as plant breeders
rights so if you've heard people talk about plant breeders rights are also
talking about the plant variety Protection Act
these court these court the the courts don't like each other okay
closer okay so you know I've talked about a couple of different types of patents here there's plant patents and there are utility patents and the really the main difference in these patents has to do with their scope for plant patents which are the pieces that are inside of the little blue dots those really only cover a clone of it's a plant and it's clones so it is just it's a plant as its described through its phenotype just just expression and then basically that plants and it's clones are the only thing covered by the patent that's it when it comes to utility patents and genetic material in general but then also in this case cannabis what can be covered are use genetics and chemistry particularly if they are novel compounds or something that you know somebody has invented they can also cover clones of a plant they can cover the cultivation process which you know inherently kind of includes the environment that something is being grown in as well as the phenotype expressions as well as you know new things that come from that plant so new flowers made from it extracts any kind of materials and potentially you know new plants that are then bred with that plants and similarly in the same way that like if you were to invent a really like state-of-the-art mop and you didn't want anyone else to copy your state-of-the-art mop under your patent it also can include plants with similar attributes and so yeah that's basically how that works to get for something to be patented just generally speaking it has to be patentable subject matter which means is it a process a machine and article of manufacture or composition composition of matter and while that might sound like everything it doesn't cover things like works of art which are covered under copyright or things like logos which are covered under trademarks it has to be new has this patent been filed with one year of the invention entering the public domain we'll talk about what public domain is in the subject or within the context of patents in a second does is it useful with plants the utility is you know pretty minor you know minimal requirement but it has to have some kind of utility and is it not obvious is it a non obvious improvement to things that already exist in the public domain and kind of the way that my one of the examples is commonly used just sort of like summarize some of these ideas is the idea of a five legged chair a five legged chair is not a useful improvement to the four legged chair which we all know and love very well it works just fine and that extra leg is not going to add anything to the patented thing and so the path of a
patent that path that any patent takes including cannabis is that it starts with a patent application an inventor often with legal assistants submits an application that there has to be a really incredible amount of description that goes into it there are specific claims in the case of utility patents there's also an enablement requirement which means that there needs to be some sort of plant matter that is submitted along with the patent to to the Patent Office it then goes to a USPTO patent examiner whose job is basically to look it well part of the job is to one make sure that the description is good and then also to make sure that it's not that the patent doesn't cover things that already exist right they want to make sure the Patent Office really wants you know ideally they want for things to come that come through the Patent Office and get patents for them to be really new and so they look for evidence of things that are similar out in the world they'll also look at for things like market entry date or dates of public disclosure any other information that they can get about when something entered the public domain it then goes through a series of rejections and revisions and eventually you can get to patent acceptance and you know just for
general record so before something is in the public domain it may be covered by trade secret laws once it enters the public domain there's a one-year window during which you can actually apply for your patent and then once you get your patent you have 20 years of patent protections that means and patent protection is basically an exclusive
right to use that thing or to sell that thing within any given market so here's
an example of a utility patent on a cannabis plant in fact it is the very first utility patent that was put out on a cannabis plant and it's claimed one covers a hybrid cannabis plant or asexual clone of that plant that has a terpene profile that includes a series of specific terpenes it has at least I think this is at least a CBD content that's at least 3% CBD and then a series
of terpenes that's at least 1% by weights I hate this thing that's killing
me I really doesn't like my computer at
all I know and a series of terpenes of which Mersin is not the most dominant terpene and from there it talks about also different combinations on top of that initial claim which include not just this set of plants but plants that might be similar in nature a plant patent on a can but this is an example of a plant patent on a cannabis plant which is actually the first and only plant patent on a cannabis plant that exists it's issued to someone with the I think it's Stephen cubby that's right and this is for a cannabis plant called Ecuadorian sativa and Ecuadorian sativa is a apparently a variety of cannabis that has like 45% limonene and limonene is one terpene and that is just a lot of limonene there are also utility patents that you can get on uses of a cannabinoid there's a famous patent number six six three oh five oh seven which is one that has been issued to the National Institutes of Health on CBD for use as a neuro protectant and antioxidant there's also one that's been in the news recently number nine by the way how fun is it to talk about patents it's so fun it's the funnest it's the best so 9 7 3 0 9 1 1 which is on cannabis extracts and method of preparing and using the same it's claimed one is a liquid cannabidiol for formulation where i'm sorry a liquid cannabinoid formulation wherein at least 95 percent of the total cannabinoids is tetrahedral hydral how do you say that tetrahydrocannabinol ik acid or THC a so and this one is actually our first ever
case of patent litigation which is happening in Colorado right now a company called you can is sue is suing pure hemp collective for stealing their formulation the jury is out on how that one will go down but how this does end up going down will say a lot to us about the enforceability of cannabis and cannabinoid based patents so you know part of the issue is that you know plants plus the cap patent system plus capitalism is you got to have big money to play filing patents can cost many many thousands of dollars if not more big money also tends to lead towards corporatization so bigger faster and cheaper suddenly enters the marketplace which makes it really difficult for small businesses in this case farmers to make a living in that in that kind of market so they often folds or struggle or just get eaten in a similar way to Silicon Valley works and we're seeing this right now a little bit in Canada and I'm not saying that this is necessarily a bad thing in all cases but you know a lot of these larger companies are buying up smaller farms and thereby buying up all of their IP and in some ways it's helpful to the small firms because it can help them you know to better navigate some of the regulatory frameworks that are set forth in Canada but at the same time it's also them basically giving up their business to a larger entity and then like losing some control over what they're doing and then last but not least genetic diversity is often diminished or lost and this is for evidence of this you can look to the story of corn corn has about 20,000 varieties registered with the US Department of Agriculture and currently there are about six genetic lines that are on the market and that's it and that is the combination of patents and you know just big money and capitalism and bigger better faster taking out smaller businesses in general making that happen
so you know patents aren't always a problem but in this case they are when they one either remove something from the public domain that was previously inside of it which when they're over broad or when they are issued without sufficient prior art and you know unfortunately the Patent Office has a documented history when something is new on the market of issuing patents on things without sufficient prior art this actually happened in early software and because for there was a long time when software was not considered to be patentable and then a change a legislative change happened in a court case I can't remember what year and after that suddenly oh you know software can be something that is covered under patent law but there wasn't enough prior art to actually determine like what is something that is you know that had existed or not and so a lot of really bullcrap lawsuits ensued so and to give you an idea about what evidence of prior art is it's documentation that claims in a pat that claims in a patent application have existed before in the public domain and this can be anything that an examiner can help them to dig deeper regardless of date for cannabis by the way lab data works really great for this which we'll talk about in a
second so you know what's happening with cannabis in this process to some degree is you know where's the prior art we've
had 80 years of prohibition in this country that warded you know all kinds of research and development we don't have prior art for cannabis in the same way that we do for other agricultural crops so you know the cannabis plant doesn't really even have a voice in this process what if I don't have a lot of money what if I'm a you know a farmer who really wants to protect my intellectual property but I don't have thousands of dollars to put into a plant patent or into a utility patent and also you know maybe I want I
P protection without having to deal with patenting you know like maybe I don't really like the system at all maybe I want to do something a little bit different so we really really really
need an alternative and prohibition really does not make this easy at all I sometimes talk about talking about talking about patents is like describing like the worst board game you've ever played in your entire life it's like nobody wants to play this board game you're like well you have to find more evidence of prior art and then it has to be dated but like you know anyway and then when it comes to cannabis it's like it has to be public but also hidden in an anonymous it's super fun so you know but this is really difficult but I am not one to shy away from a challenge so we're gonna do it anyway so I'm gonna give you a little bit of an overview of what we're working on so first thing
that we're doing is we are doing as much as as much as possible we are collecting data from labs when I inherited this project in November of last year we were only collecting genetic data but it turns out that when you look at any kind of patent application more of what you see is cannabinoid and terpene data so we are doing our best to collect as much data about cannabinoid and terpene stuff as we can and while getting data from labs is great and accurate and anonymous and every int or potentially anonymous I'm making it anonymous then and that's great it kind of takes away from the ability for me as a grower to be able to say hey I have this I have this cultivar that I've created and I want to give it to the public domain so what we're building right now is a
system that allows for public domain declarations this is an alternative system to patenting that will allow people to get their information into the public domain and then along with this we're also putting together a license an open-source license for cannabis people have talked about creating something like this for a really long time and we are actually going to do it and hopefully if anyone here is interested in you here is interested in open-source who loves open-source technology yeah okay cool awesome I actually would really love to have y'all as a part of this conversation because I think that one thing that the cannabis industry cannabis industry knows a lot about really good weed especially the Pacific Northwest thank you Pacific Northwest open source licensing not so much and so there's a lot of work to do to talk about you know how we've done open source licensing and what's worked and not worked in software and then talk about how that could potentially work for for cannabis as well
our overall system this is what we're building so far we've got a very basic prototype of our of our database but I'm hoping to really rebuilding that as well and actually if any we have any hackers in the room who want to get their hands dirty destroying and rebuilding my system let me know I don't have money to offer you but I mean you can work on organizing a bunch of cannabis data doesn't that sound like fun I think so so but we're building one of the things I've discovered is that some labs will produce their reports in HTML that makes it a really ample opportunity for me to do individual scrapers that will then allow me to collate a whole bunch of data about a single plant all in once all at once feed it into the system and then through it create a really awesome open data set of cannabis data that people can use and for obvious reasons this has to be like the most secure thing ever I have so much envy for Canada right now I'd like I'm if I could convince my partner to move with me to Toronto like tomorrow I we'd do it but here not leaving Oregon which is also fine but anyway so this has to be a really secure system and so that's what we're working on
we're also like I mentioned working on an open-source license and we're it's in the works it's not quite in a good enough spot where I can share it with you although I was kind of hoping for that but we're working with influence from Creative Commons the open source seed initiative the ODC open database license and I just learned from Kevin Chen I don't know if he's in the room about the open material transfer agreements so cool about you know transferring biological material in between universities in an open way that's about the raddest thing I've ever heard so I'm gonna look to that yeah and as we're building this you know we're a non-profit we're primarily run on volunteers you know we have some questions and I'd love to open it up to y'all to maybe help me get some answers what are the best security practices for animate and for anonymity for verifiable anonymity within this context is blockchain the only option or is there like some other awesome thing that I haven't heard of yet like gold chain or something I don't know also how enforceable would an open-source license be I think that people have a lot of questions about that and my answer right now is we won't know until we try it and if we never try we'll never know and also should we move to Canada no really so yeah well what questions do you have I imagine that you have some questions for us too so let's discuss I'll open it up to the floor yes so that's a great question two of our board members are based out of Northern California which is a big market for a lot of those folks and we're also increasingly trying to get the word out and in magazines like advance nutrients and other things and other like publications that get the word out to growers I've also had thing I've had a lot of luck getting on the radio in Mendocino County and that kind of thing and through some of those outlets were beginning to reach out to growers but primarily on the west coast I'm definitely open to advice or ideas on getting to people nationally I'm having some fun conversations with some of the larger publications out there right now so my fingers are crossed with that - what's up man that's a good question I mean I think that the worst-case scenario in some ways it's bigger than just patents like patents are one piece of the issue and a bigger piece of it that I really see happening is a combination of Big Pharma and larger business is really getting a strong hold over most of not only just what's being grown but what's what's able to be sold right like what's happening on in Oregon right now is really really really really apocalyptic to some degree and I mean we all there's up moments there's down moments we're definitely in a down moment and part of the reason that we're in a down moment is because you know Oregon in the black market export along with along with California exported a ton and exports I should say a ton of cannabis you know throughout the country and throughout the world within the legal market those same growers are like yeah you know what we want to do this right we want to do this legally are now not able to make it make a living because we have too much weed because the weed that we were shipping elsewhere is now stuck in the state and there's like this big question of what we're what we can do with all of it and so I think that in to some degree an even bigger problem than the patents that I'm seeing is this is the sort of separation between the legal cannabis and the illegal cannabis market as long as we're still putting people in jail prohibition isn't over as long as we're still criminalizing people for using for growing the plant the war isn't over and so to some degree I see that as more of the worst case scenario is that there isn't a way for small farmers to make a living and to participate so they are then forced to compete on the black market and so then there's still condemned in the same way that they happened for 80 years fuck that noise so that's the worst case scenario thanks all what else patent cannabis yes well for Beth
Schecter not the executive director of the open cannabis project I basically want to shit on the front door of the White House and set it on fire as oh it is great cool they know anyway you're listening to me through I come here it doesn't fucking matter [Laughter] but I think that um you know I but in all honesty so we were just lobbying in in DC a few weeks ago and the process there right now is just so much more incremental and I think that like I mean it true you know truly part of the challenge is like you know dealing with some people who have maybe older mindsets about some of the stuff and you know want to sort of keep the status quo and so with those folks you kind of have to like you know you kind of have to like pander to their interest you know like you have to talk to you know people who are Republican senators about like how crappy it is to be a woman walking through downtown any city in America with a bag full of cash because I can't get a bank account oh and by the way didn't you want for me to pay my taxes anyway like I I want to be able I as a legal operating business in the United States want to be able to write a check to my employees and then I want to be able to pay my taxes and I want to be able to do so with a check from a bank you know and I think that like those kinds of arguments are really catch the ear of people who believe in states rights and who believe in moving those kinds of freedoms forward ultimately though until we can get rid of Schedule one which is like a whole different ballgame this that's not going to change and the drug scheduling is determined by you know the Department of Health and Human Services as long as well as you know the CSA and those are not those are not officials that we get to vote on there are people who are appointed by our you know by the executive branch you know a patent examiner's for example they are to some degree can consider to have similar jobs as judges they are there to make a judgement on a case and we don't necessarily get to vote on them so it's um it's it's a it's if that's a really really really good question and it's I wish I had I wish I had a better answer but you know the answer in politics typically is that you have to sort of like push these things forward slowly but I would really love to see just a massive sea change and then I won't make threats of pooping on people's doorsteps yes yes exactly and actually if that's something that we are that's a great question something that we already do do if you have any academic resources that you know of about cannabis that are in the public domain please send them my way we are creating it's called our external data resources but the idea is that it becomes like a much larger index of prior art about cannabis so yes we're definitely looking to do that we're also looking to get involved with a patent education technical training program so that we can talk to the Patent Office about you know cannabis cultivation and how it works because you know the more that we learn about cannabis and genetics and I'd actually really love to hear dr. Lewis's thoughts on this you know the more that we learn about these things the more that we learn that like you know you can have the same piece of genetics grown in a bunch of different places and it can produce wildly different results right in terms of like chemical expressions so you know but that isn't necessarily you know unless you're doing a utility patent which you know might be a little too broad of patent potentially for cannabis then it there's really not a great way to like sort of like fit with that but in general I think that you know the they definitely do need more evidence of prior art we've reached out to the US Patent Office about what we do and yeah a lot of the examiners know now which is good but it took a lot of cold calling and finding people's numbers maybe they didn't want me to find their numbers but I found them yes yes good call yes
[Music] say more about what you mean by like standards yeah sure yeah and I think that your question touches and I'm gonna do my best to answer it but it touches on a few different things right one is that you know with the in the case of epidemics which I mean honestly the idea of having any kind of cannabinoid based medicine on the market is really actually for epilepsy is amazing and the fact that has been fda-approved here is incredible I think that one of the things that's a challenge for me to wrap my head around is the lack of our ability in this country to do clinical trials that would allow people who are not potentially involved in a big pharmaceutical company like GW Pharma who are able to potentially - who are able to participate in those trials - to do the same it's really difficult if not impossible you like we can't get federal funding to do that kind of work in the United States or it's very very very difficult to do that work so the people who are able to you know make that kind of quality that you're talking about and to be able to say we have a product that you know really does this and does this well they have a lot of money behind it so it would be great if we were able to have more research available to everyone - OH - a lot of people in this country so that we can also participate in creating really high quality products and then the other piece of it is you know I and this is and this is tricky I mean if you're going to be selling something to a consumer like you do want to happen you do want to have your product tested right you do want it to have gone through a lab you want for it to make sure that it's like free of pesticides that it doesn't have like some weird mold growing on it like you do have to have quality assurances for things before you put them on the market and I think we're still figuring out like what those standards are again ultimately I think that if we were able to lift the prohibition on this plant that some of those things would get figured out in a more logical way and right now it really does benefit people with a lot more money than a lot of these farmers and small-scale producers have and so they just don't even have a fighting chance and that's why I met yes [Music]
hmm no more questions well if that's it we'll wrap up thank you everybody have your cards and buttons and stuff [Applause]
Feedback