The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

Video thumbnail (Frame 0) Video thumbnail (Frame 425) Video thumbnail (Frame 609) Video thumbnail (Frame 698) Video thumbnail (Frame 802) Video thumbnail (Frame 3242)
Video in TIB AV-Portal: The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

Formal Metadata

The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
Title of Series
CC Attribution 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Release Date

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture, including crop and livestock production, forestry and associated land use changes, are responsible for a significant fraction of anthropogenic emissions, up to 30% according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Yet while emissions from fossil fuels are updated yearly and by multiple sources—including national-level statistics from the International Energy Agency (IEA)—no comparable efforts for reporting global statistics for agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) emissions exist: the latest complete assessment was the 2007 IPCC report, based on 2005 emission data. This gap is critical for several reasons. First, potentially large climate funding could be linked in coming decades to more precise estimates of emissions and mitigation potentials. For many developing countries, and especially the least developed ones, this requires improved assessments of AFOLU emissions. Second, growth in global emissions from fossil fuels has outpaced that from AFOLU during every decade of the period 1961–2010, so the relative contribution of the latter to total climate forcing has diminished over time, with a need for regular updates. We present results from a new GHG database developed at FAO, providing a complete and coherent time series of emission statistics over a reference period 1961–2010, at country level, based on FAOSTAT activity data and IPCC Tier 1 methodology. We discuss results at global and regional level, focusing on trends in the agriculture sector and net deforestation. Our results complement those available from the IPCC, extending trend analysis to a longer historical period and, critically, beyond 2005 to more recent years. In particular, from 2000 to 2010, we find that agricultural emissions increased by 1.1% annually, reaching 4.6 Gt CO2 yr−1 in 2010 (up to 5.4–5.8 Gt CO2 yr−1 with emissions from biomass burning and organic soils included). Over the same decade 2000–2010, the ratio of agriculture to fossil fuel emissions has decreased, from 17.2% to 13.7%, and the decrease is even greater for the ratio of net deforestation to fossil fuel emissions: from 19.1% to 10.1%. In fact, in the year 2000, emissions from agriculture have been consistently larger—about 1.2 Gt CO2 yr−1 in 2010—than those from net deforestation.

Related Material

Video is accompanying material for the following resource
Greenhouse gas Paper Greenhouse effect Video Electric power distribution Emission nebula
Artillery battery
Greenhouse gas Paper Geokorona Stellar atmosphere Year Emissionsvermögen Ground station Global warming Last
Typesetting Climate change Impact event Hot working Musical development Limiter Orbital period Emissionsvermögen Video Climate
hello my name is such as school to online delete also worked on paper that disappeared from and I held on the new lower greenhouse gas emissions that the base that is being
developed within a faster which is the official FAO statistical batteries my co-authors you
will try to explain why we think this paper is worth however there are basically
3 3 reports the 1st is that agriculture plays a an important role in global emissions of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere and therefore I think it's important to people want define these nations as accurately as possible both in space and time the 2nd 1 is that whereas in terms of emissions from fossil-fuel use which dominate the botanical began sphere whereas these are well known and there is an international agency that reports them every year by country and globally the International Energy Agency there is no such thing for agriculture and therefore if you were to ask yourself what were the emissions from agriculture last year and you will not find a good answer a anywhere in the literature so you would have to wait for the reports by the environment the by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which come out reflect CCS and be content with so for missing the point of view and I am efforts and try to bridge that gap because many of these conditions can be computed and calculated or estimated with because there's a lot of uncertainty around said 1 of the methods that Cocke is that is to use the so-called at the beginning so the information what happens quantum cultural at the beginning we capture year by year how that information using the fuck elected here that and as the
1 that we use to complete that leaves there is another important point which we feel very strongly about that field which is that many of the countries that would need to report those editions of of more with with much urgency because to import incorrect reporting opens up opportunities for mediation therefore climate finance if you read or at least picking the role within the international set of actions that we will need to send in motions to go to limit climate change impacts are developing countries for agricultural course plays a major role in the economy and where the opportunities to mitigate a line actually a great opportunities because often in agriculture and mitigation actions the his actions that reduce emissions also to make the systems more resilient and and spurred World Development and therefore the database is also serves to countries that we need to report the admissions by biannually starting 2014 as a help to them to 1st identify with a major revisions are country-by-country over time and how to get feel they can develop work programs to improve their own national assessments together with us therefore for ridges both the science and the the policy good aligned with the interests we I we have here is that they all and I hope in this period you will find that the article interesting thank you and to the next line