Vulnerabilities—bibliometric analysis and literature review of evolving concepts

Video thumbnail (Frame 0) Video thumbnail (Frame 154) Video thumbnail (Frame 268) Video thumbnail (Frame 389) Video thumbnail (Frame 1484) Video thumbnail (Frame 1923) Video thumbnail (Frame 2011) Video thumbnail (Frame 2134) Video thumbnail (Frame 2393) Video thumbnail (Frame 2567) Video thumbnail (Frame 2781) Video thumbnail (Frame 2975) Video thumbnail (Frame 3071) Video thumbnail (Frame 3703) Video thumbnail (Frame 3856)
Video in TIB AV-Portal: Vulnerabilities—bibliometric analysis and literature review of evolving concepts

Formal Metadata

Title
Vulnerabilities—bibliometric analysis and literature review of evolving concepts
Title of Series
Author
License
CC Attribution 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
2015
Language
English

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Abstract
In this work we analyse the evolution of the vulnerability concept in the research streams of climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR). We combine a traditional literature review with data mining procedures applied to bibliographic databases to reconstruct the history of the concept within various research topics, showing its evolution and convergences over time. To do that, we integrate different methods combining machine learning algorithms with network and cluster analyses to examine a set of 3757 articles, analysing their distinctive features and similarities on the basis of their contents as well as co-authorships. Bibliometric analyses enable the identification of different communities of articles, pinpointing key papers and authors, while literature review makes it possible to assess the concept of vulnerability evolved within and beyond research communities and scientific networks. Moreover, this work examines the role played by documents published by UN institutions (UNDRO, UNISDR, IPCC) in contributing to the evolution of vulnerability and related concepts. Results show that signs of convergence are evident between the two research streams, and that the IPCC reports have played a major role in proposing solutions for unifying definitions of vulnerability. We observe that the phases of preparation of the IPCC reports are very rich in methodological and terminological developments, while after publication, the literature shows evident signs of propagation of the proposed concepts. The DRR research stream developed before the research stream on CCA, but the latter flourished rapidly and became much larger in terms of number of publications. Nevertheless, in terms of contents, adaptation studies and the IPCC have shown increasing adoption of the concepts developed within the disaster research stream, in particular with regard to the interpretation of vulnerability as one of the dimensions of risk.

Related Material

Video Electric power distribution
Climate Centre Party (Germany)
Focus (optics) Climate change Hot working Adapter pattern Initiator <Steuerungstechnik> Cartridge (firearms) Ion Book design Order and disorder (physics) Snow Conductivity (electrolytic)
Seeschiff Paper Cooling tower Paper Water vapor FACTS (newspaper)
Woodturning Buick Century FACTS (newspaper)
Focus (optics) Climate change Adapter pattern Belt (mechanical)
Noise reduction Climate change Gentleman Bahnelement Beta particle Year Order and disorder (physics) Disc brake
Climate change Paper Mechanic Year Season Nanotechnology Automobile platform Progressive lens
when we communicate we use how words
but not necessarily in a concept that we attach to these words is always the same even
communities may have a different understanding of the same not only but
also over time on these concepts they may vote this up it's also because scientific communities we have different scientific communities having different understanding on the side of the center this is the case for example of honor beating which is a very important term that is used by many since scientific communities our work started with the sort of initial assumption that 2 distinct research communities exist 1 community focus on climate change adaptation and other community focus on these us that is conduction in order to confirm or not initially book this is we
ended up with the statistical description of a some 20 topics needing to find and the work that our comp most commonly used in the titles in the he worked and in the abstracts of the under some numbers of people that we had analyzed typically we can
analyze a network of waters
to the cool to ships in fact and the networks of papers if we analyze
the supporters time and in particular starting at the turn of the century we see that the fact that these nectar becomes more and more complex we have
alters collaborating these collaboration increase over time and we have for all tourists that maintain
that their focus on climate change adaptation and these are the green belts here and alters that
instead of maintaining that their main interest in disaster this production in red the but many altered sure increasing
collaborations across the 2 communities
who could understand how a
notion of of that we can define as an endpoint to another beta or an outcome but I believe it was typical of the climate change community when he stayed there the disaster disk reduction preferred to use whatever came as 1 of the elements that for discussed suspending practice in order
to fully understand the devolution of the notion of audibility over 25 years with the man across these
research communities we absolutely need due to focus our analysis not only on the scientific literature but also on their reports of International Organization of the United Nations like the PCC and U.S. and then you and I have here the 2 streams are indeed converging they are not ending up with the single at to the definition but probably with end the season anyway quite interesting because we see similar efforts at directing progress on in different research fields and therefore for the near future it would be quite interesting to see this same evolutions in the same mechanisms that we could describe it in our papers for come but never be leading climate change and disaster this production can be observed for example there's an outcome of efforts like a future or adding phenomena the platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services the system quiet and interesting that perspective to analyzer related concepts like for example proceeding and so like for example system immediately even and see how they will live off of over in the coming years
Feedback