Regional carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change in Asia, 1980–2009

Video thumbnail (Frame 0) Video thumbnail (Frame 262) Video thumbnail (Frame 510) Video thumbnail (Frame 631) Video thumbnail (Frame 742) Video thumbnail (Frame 992) Video thumbnail (Frame 1577) Video thumbnail (Frame 1850) Video thumbnail (Frame 1932) Video thumbnail (Frame 2067) Video thumbnail (Frame 2146) Video thumbnail (Frame 2292) Video thumbnail (Frame 2456) Video thumbnail (Frame 3429) Video thumbnail (Frame 3585) Video thumbnail (Frame 4300) Video thumbnail (Frame 4442)
Video in TIB AV-Portal: Regional carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change in Asia, 1980–2009

Formal Metadata

Title
Regional carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change in Asia, 1980–2009
Title of Series
Author
License
CC Attribution 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
2016
Language
English

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Abstract
We present a synthesis of the land-atmosphere carbon flux from land use and land cover change (LULCC) in Asia using multiple data sources and paying particular attention to deforestation and forest regrowth fluxes. The data sources are quasi-independent and include the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization-Forest Resource Assessment (FAO-FRA 2015; country-level inventory estimates), the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGARv4.3), the 'Houghton' bookkeeping model that incorporates FAO-FRA data, an ensemble of 8 state-of-the-art Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVM), and 2 recently published independent studies using primarily remote sensing techniques. The estimates are aggregated spatially to Southeast, East, and South Asia and temporally for three decades, 1980–1989, 1990–1999 and 2000–2009. Since 1980, net carbon emissions from LULCC in Asia were responsible for 20%–40% of global LULCC emissions, with emissions from Southeast Asia alone accounting for 15%–25% of global LULCC emissions during the same period. In the 2000s and for all Asia, three estimates (FAO-FRA, DGVM, Houghton) were in agreement of a net source of carbon to the atmosphere, with mean estimates ranging between 0.24 to 0.41 Pg C yr−1, whereas EDGARv4.3 suggested a net carbon sink of −0.17 Pg C yr−1. Three of 4 estimates suggest that LULCC carbon emissions declined by at least 34% in the preceding decade (1990–2000). Spread in the estimates is due to the inclusion of different flux components and their treatments, showing the importance to include emissions from carbon rich peatlands and land management, such as shifting cultivation and wood harvesting, which appear to be consistently underreported.

Related Material

Video Electric power distribution Year Lead
Kondo-Effekt Hot working Book cover
Finger protocol
Book cover Force
Gunn diode Prozessleittechnik Model building
Superheterodyne receiver Galaxy Rapid transit Hot isostatic pressing Kühlkörper
Apparent magnitude Cardinal direction Emission nebula Global warming
Paper Kondo-Effekt Angeregter Zustand Forage harvester Emission nebula Global warming Electromigration Noise figure Reflexionskoeffizient Neutronenaktivierung
and is lyric I I'm a 2nd year PhD student in the Department of Ecology on Tennessee University and the lead author
on the publication regional carbon fluxes from ladies length cover change in Asia 1980 2000 so this
work grew out of collaboration to cite this around the world the major
specific network tried to study regional carbon
budget of Asia and my role in this project was to quantify carbon fluxes from ladies length of a
change in 3 regions of Asia this included carbon what's from deforestation playing clearing land management and force regret the purpose of the research article published was to identify benchmark for future studies that aim to quantify carbon fluxes from land use and land cover change we use multiple
datasets and study 1 of the
benefits of our approach is to try and obtain quantified carbon budgets we use different
estimates from different approaches including
inventory a on a Grassmann process based
simulation models and the bookkeeping and an exciting model
and 1 of the benefits to
using these different approaches for us is that we can get a robust
estimate and some level of confidence the carbon fluxes from deportation
and land management enforce regret that would otherwise be limited to the uncertainties associated with any 1 individual some of the challenges in analyzing the differences from a different approach including inclusion of different on what science datasets including carbon fluxes the from deportation press others including common which imports which serves as a carbon sink of the multiple datasets our a unique approach to reducing uncertainty over all
get a better understanding the carbon
fluxes from when using my career change in
East Asia for example the client and the
last 2 decades primarily from costly Southeast Asia there has been an increase in carbon fluxes from when these smoke of change since 1980 have been about equal in magnitude between 19 98 and 2000 these carbon fluxes in primarily from deforestation people and fires in the south Asia region that uncertainty has been
reduced by pooling together different datasets is the suggestion
that there is a large contribution the carbon fluxes from poor harvesting activity 1 of the more interesting figures in the paper is 1 that shows that carbon fluxes from ladies in waiting for a change globally here is that you reflections from my user like migratory intonation and shows the increasing contribution the carbon fluxes in Asia in the past 2 decades it shows that when this linked from a change in Asia is increasing in importance and its relative influence people's skills
Feedback