Community consistency determines the stability transition window of power-grid nodes
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Formal Metadata
Title |
| |
Title of Series | ||
Number of Parts | 62 | |
Author | ||
License | CC Attribution 3.0 Unported: You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor. | |
Identifiers | 10.5446/38803 (DOI) | |
Publisher | ||
Release Date | ||
Language |
Content Metadata
Subject Area | ||
Genre | ||
Abstract |
|
26
00:00
Electric power distributionParticle physicsPlain bearingVideoNyquist stability criterionLunar nodeComputer animation
00:03
Hose couplingNyquist stability criterionLunar nodeGenerationElectric power transmissionRotor (electric)Electric generatorTheodolitePerturbation theoryPower (physics)Astronomisches FensterLunar nodePower stationElectricityBird vocalizationTransformatorstationTransmission lineHot workingRotation
00:56
Lunar nodeCell (biology)KopfstützeSensorElectric power transmissionAstronomisches FensterTheodolitePower (physics)
01:45
SensorKey (engineering)
01:57
SensorSensorDiagram
02:11
Sensor
02:15
SensorBasis (linear algebra)TheodolitePower (physics)Electric power transmissionAstronomisches FensterMeasurementViseLunar nodeDiagram
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
00:04
Let's look at what Bayesian stability transition window is at first. A power grid is composed of power plants, substations, and transmission lines. A rotational motion of a generator is synchronized with that of other generators.
00:22
When a local site suddenly consumes or generates a large amount of electricity, it affects the rotational motion of a node. However, since the rotors are synchronized, the perturbation on a rotor can be observed by the synchronous interaction of one network.
00:41
As a result, rotors can recover the synchrony. Bayesian stability qualifies a node's ability to recover its synchronization when perturbed at a certain coupling strength. In general, Bayesian stability goes from 0 to 1 as coupling strength increases.
01:06
Now we obtain the transmission width ΔK that represents the width of the transition window for all nodes in a network individually. Likewise, in this study, we measure ΔK of all nodes in Chilean power grid.
01:27
Let's look at community consistency. A community is a subset that is more strongly connected within the group than to the rest of the network. Here, we have three communities.
01:43
Some community detection methods are non-deterministic and could also give a different community decomposition between different runs of the same algorithm. Let's see one more time.
02:00
A red node is assigned to a community with the same community members every time. The red node is very consistent. On the other hand, a green node frequently changes its community members at every runs of community detection. The green node is very inconsistent.
02:24
We define nodes classified to the same community as having high community consistency. In this study, we also measure community consistency of all nodes in the Chilean power grid.
02:40
We have studied the Bayesian stability transition window as a new metric for characterizing the contribution of a node to the stability of a power grid. By comparing the community consistency with the transition window, we find that the community consistency is a good predictor of the transition window or vice versa.