Bestand wählen
Merken

Probing the reality of quantum state

Zitierlink des Filmsegments
Embed Code

Für dieses Video liegen keine automatischen Analyseergebnisse vor.

Analyseergebnisse werden nur für Videos aus Technik, Architektur, Chemie, Informatik, Mathematik und Physik erstellt, bei denen dies rechtlich zulässig ist.

Metadaten

Formale Metadaten

Titel Probing the reality of quantum state
Serientitel The Annual Conference on Quantum Cryptography (QCRYPT) 2012
Anzahl der Teile 30
Autor Patra, Manas Kumar
Duport, F.
Olislager, L.
Safioui, S.
Pironio, S.
Massar, S.
Mitwirkende Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT)
National University of Singapore (NUS)
Lizenz CC-Namensnennung - keine kommerzielle Nutzung - keine Bearbeitung 2.5 Schweiz:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt in unveränderter Form zu jedem legalen und nicht-kommerziellen Zweck nutzen, vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
DOI 10.5446/36667
Herausgeber Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich
Erscheinungsjahr 2012
Sprache Englisch

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet Informatik
Abstract Is the quantum state real – a property of the system it is assigned to? Or does it represent only our (incomplete) knowledge of the system? It is possible that the second alternative – the epistemic character of the quantum state – comes about because quantum mechanics is obtained by some statistical averaging over a “complete” theory of nature. Such models are often called “hidden variable” models, because the true variables describing the system, the ontic state, are not accessible. Recently Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph [1] showed that, assuming the natural assumption of “preparation independence”, epistemic models of the quantum state are in contradiction with the predictions of quantum theory. “Preparation independence” means that independent preparations of systems correspond to a joint distribution (over the ontic states) is the product of individual distributions. Here we adopt a different approach. We show that, assuming both a form of continuity and separability (a weak form of preparation independence), epistemic interpretations of the quantum state are in contradiction with quantum theory. We also discuss some implications of “hidden-variable” models for cryptography. We then describe a simple high-precision experiment optics experiment that tests some of the predictions of continuous and separable epistemic models. The experiment is particularly simple. It involves attenuated coherent states in time bins of dimension up to 80 propagating in optical fibres. Our experimental results are in agreement with the predictions of quantum theory and provide strong constraints on possible epistemic extensions of quantum mechanics. These results are reported in [2]. [1] M. F. Pusey, J. Barrett, and T. Rudolph, On the reality of the quantum state, Nature Physics, 2309, (2012). [2] M. K. Patra, L. Olislager, F. Duport, J. Safioui, S. Pironio and S. Massar, Experimentally probing the reality of the quantum state, submitted (2012)

Ähnliche Filme

Loading...
Feedback