We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Welcome to the Entreprecariat - Disrupting Precarization

00:00

Formal Metadata

Title
Welcome to the Entreprecariat - Disrupting Precarization
Title of Series
Number of Parts
234
Author
License
CC Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 Germany:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
The entreprecariat refers to the reciprocal influence of an entrepreneurialist regime and pervasive precarity. Entrepreneurship spilled out of strictly entrepreneurial jobs requiring ordinary people to behave like entrepreneurs. Similarly, precarity became paradigmatic of society as a series of diverse yet analogous conditions, both material and immaterial. Precarity and entrepreurialism form the social atmosphere. Is it possible to turn entrepreneurship into a means of addressing precarization?
Computer animationJSONXMLUMLLecture/Conference
Multiplication signStability theoryDegree (graph theory)Network topologyMeeting/Interview
Stability theoryHorizonException handlingWeightMathematicsMultiplication signPoint (geometry)Lecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
Linker (computing)Meeting/InterviewLecture/ConferenceComputer animation
Order (biology)Form (programming)Meeting/InterviewComputer animation
Infinite conjugacy class propertyDifferent (Kate Ryan album)1 (number)Lecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
RAIDRight anglePerspective (visual)Category of beingVolume (thermodynamics)Link (knot theory)
Civil engineeringCASE <Informatik>Spectrum (functional analysis)AreaDeterminantWage labourLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
Element (mathematics)WordTerm (mathematics)Context awarenessContent (media)VideoconferencingForm (programming)Computer fontEscape characterElement (mathematics)Lecture/ConferenceComputer animation
Number theoryAxiom of choiceProcess (computing)Ubiquitous computingCharge carrierArithmetic meanComputer animationMeeting/Interview
AxiomAxiomTheoryLecture/ConferenceComputer animation
HypercubeFood energyField (computer science)Programming paradigmGroup actionEuler anglesContext awarenessGeneric programmingSeries (mathematics)DemoscenePoint (geometry)AxiomCASE <Informatik>Position operatorNatural languageProcess (computing)Mixed realityInstance (computer science)Lecture/Conference
Object (grammar)Multiplication signContext awarenessInstance (computer science)Latent heatEuler anglesForcing (mathematics)Lecture/ConferenceComputer animation
Ocean currentProcess (computing)Staff (military)Computer animation
Series (mathematics)VideoconferencingMultiplication signPercolation theoryMeeting/Interview
HypermediaResultantArithmetic meanInternetworkingWordEmailElectronic mailing listCombinational logicMeeting/InterviewXML
Infinite conjugacy class propertySet (mathematics)WordCondition numberType theoryDifferent (Kate Ryan album)Computing platformVideoconferencingProfil (magazine)Computer animationLecture/Conference
Computer animation
CASE <Informatik>HierarchyFrame problemPredictabilityForm (programming)Dimensional analysisState of matterScaling (geometry)Different (Kate Ryan album)Arithmetic meanRight angleTheoryVideo gamePhysical systemComputer animation
HypermediaDigital photography1 (number)Stability theoryUniverse (mathematics)Formal grammarData managementMeeting/Interview
Digital photographyComputer-generated imageryAreaVideoconferencingCausalityComputing platformDigital mediaCartesian coordinate systemOrder (biology)Arithmetic meanInformationMeeting/InterviewXML
WebsiteRadio-frequency identificationSheaf (mathematics)Similarity (geometry)Presentation of a groupAssociative propertyParallel portDirection (geometry)Computer animation
Multitier architectureEigenvalues and eigenvectorsDuality (mathematics)Theory of relativityHypermediaCategory of beingMeeting/Interview
Term (mathematics)Form (programming)Mixture modelDialectAsynchronous Transfer ModeMoment (mathematics)Prisoner's dilemmaMeeting/Interview
Computer iconMassCASE <Informatik>RootWage labourComputer animation
Sign (mathematics)FamilyNumber theoryHypermediaMedical imagingEvent horizonSeries (mathematics)Group actionSocial classArithmetic meanChemical equationFocus (optics)Exploit (computer security)SoftwareComputer animationDrawing
Metropolitan area networkTask (computing)Form (programming)Cohesion (computer science)Building1 (number)FacebookPressureLink (knot theory)WordTable (information)Computer animation
Table (information)Computer animation
ExpressionCombinational logicState of matterComputer animation
Lattice (order)WordMeeting/Interview
Structural equation modelingMeasurementMultiplication signHypermediaSound effectVideo gameComputer animation
NP-hardDemosceneComputing platformXML
Group actionSelf-organizationLecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
Workstation <Musikinstrument>File formatContext awarenessGroup actionBusiness modelLecture/Conference
Endliche ModelltheorieAnnihilator (ring theory)1 (number)Degree (graph theory)CASE <Informatik>ResultantRankingLecture/Conference
Social classEntropie <Informationstheorie>RankingModal logicMeeting/InterviewLecture/Conference
Charge carrierBitLecture/Conference
QuicksortVideo gameLink (knot theory)Device driverSocial classDifferent (Kate Ryan album)Medical imagingDivisorPressureEndliche ModelltheorieVariety (linguistics)HypermediaInternetworkingLevel (video gaming)Term (mathematics)LinearizationLecture/Conference
QuicksortLevel (video gaming)Lecture/Conference
PressureFrame problemEndliche ModelltheorieTerm (mathematics)Shared memoryLecture/Conference
Multiplication signPosition operatorShared memoryLecture/Conference
CASE <Informatik>Combinational logicLecture/Conference
Multiplication signComputing platformLevel (video gaming)Meeting/Interview
MereologyInternetworkingDisk read-and-write headLecture/Conference
CASE <Informatik>QuicksortMereologyCondition numberData structureLecture/Conference
HypermediaView (database)CASE <Informatik>Lecture/ConferenceMeeting/Interview
Computer networkQuicksortTerm (mathematics)Physical systemLecture/ConferenceMeeting/InterviewComputer animation
Single sign-onHypermediaRoundness (object)Lecture/ConferenceComputer animation
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
Hello everyone, thanks for being here. Today I'm going to talk about a few ideas related to the entrevocariat,
a concept I've been trying to articulate for some time now. I'd like to start by saying something on how this interest came about. Not so long ago, I got a three years research scholarship which, among other things, provided me with a certain degree of stability.
Characterized by a rarely long temporal horizon. Despite being this an obvious exception, my relative stability felt normal to me. And from this vantage point, I could perceive all the short intention spans of my friends and colleagues as a structural aberration.
All of this changed when the scholarship was coming to an end. This is when I felt the full weight of reality all at once. At the time, I didn't know exactly how to describe what I was going through. Then, while I was delving into entrepreneurship, I stumbled upon an old INC article by Wilson Harrell.
Here, this successful entrepreneur described a specific feeling that only entrepreneurs were supposed to experience. Wilson Harrell named this emotion entrepreneurial terror. And even though I had nothing to do with entrepreneurship in the strict sense, I could deeply relate with the roller coaster ride described by Harrell.
Wilson Harrell, in order to demonstrate how this peculiar form of terror is so common among entrepreneurs, Harrell suggested to go to one of them and ask, so how are you coping with terror? According to him, such question will trigger some surprise,
yet it would be immediately understood by the fellow entrepreneur. Now, I believe that the reaction of many of my friends, especially the ones involved in academia or in the creative industries, wouldn't be that different. Today, exactly 30 years after the publication of Harrell's article,
any kind of human activity or endeavor is understood through an entrepreneurial perspective. This is partially due to the propaganda carried out by professional entrepreneurs themselves, like Wright Hoffman, co-founder of Linkedin, who introduced this book by quoting Muhammad Yunus.
Here, the Bangladeshi social entrepreneur declares, all human beings are entrepreneurs. When we were in the caves, where we were all self-employed, finding our food, feeding ourselves. That's where human history began. As civilization came, we suppressed it. We became labor because they stamped us, you are labor.
We forgot that we are entrepreneurs. So this is how entrepreneurship turns into entrepreneurialism, an ideology that naturalizes risk-taking and self-determination. And while doing this, it expands entrepreneurial terror to the whole social spectrum.
As you probably know, there is another term that is often associated with this now widespread form of terror, the word is precarity. While precarity indicates the very content and context of this sphere, entrepreneurialism is now meant to offer an escape from that. Both are constitutive elements of the current social reality.
Here is a one-liner that highlights the relationship between precarious work and entrepreneurialism. Can't find a job, becomes an entrepreneur. As I'll show you afterwards, the choice of the success kid meme is not accidental. The reciprocal influence between an entrepreneurialist regime and
pervasive precarity, their ambivalent coexistence, is what the concept of the anthropocariate refers to. To articulate some of the ways in which this mutual influence takes place, I'd like to introduce what I would call a postulate of the anthropocariate. So here it is.
The more precarity is present, the less entrepreneurialism is voluntary. The postulate is well exemplified by the scene of I, Daniel Blake, a 2016 movie by Ken Loach on the nightmare of work fair in the UK. Here, a group of unemployed people is required to take a course to improve their chances to find a job.
According to the course coach, in a context characterized by the scarcity of available positions, it is imperative to stand out from the crowd. This attitude implies the understanding of individuals as competitors, as micro companies constantly seeking attention through personal publicity.
The paradigm of a person as a micro company is super invasive to be almost invisible. We find it, for instance, in the field of creative industries, where among real literary genre, mixing self-help and creative inspiration is emerging.
A case in point is this book, which adapts a series of generic job-seeking platitudes to the target group of creative graduates. In its introduction, we encounter another peculiar aspect of the anthropocariate, a cognitive dissonance in which subjects face the hardships of finding a job, while at the same time,
being expected to address the biggest problems we face today, like poverty and war. The blending of a forced entrepreneurial attitude with specific instances of precarity is particularly evident in the context of personal crowdfunding. Browsing GoFundMe, we encounter hundreds of young graduates that cannot afford
unpaid internships, which often represent unnecessary staff to land a job. So they smile at the camera and passionately describe their interests and academic achievements while detailing their specific financial needs. They cheerfully advertise their personal burden.
Clement Nokos is one of them, a political science graduate from Canada who got accepted for a prestigious unpaid internship at the United Nations. A one time only opportunity, as he calls it. Not only Nokos produced a somehow ironic four minutes long video to advertise his campaign. He also conceived a series of perks to be offered to particularly generous donors.
In a long post on media.com, Nokos explained in detail the reasons and the results of his campaign. The above header is a good summary. Eventually, Nokos was able to raise less than 2,000 out of the 6,000 he's
asked for. The Internet is full of portmanteau words that work in combination with the word entrepreneur. Recently, I started to collect them and I created a list including interesting neologisms like so far entrepreneur, that entrepreneur or even one entrepreneur. Given my preoccupation with compulsory entrepreneurial endeavors
resulting from different types of precarious conditions, I decided to come up with yet another bland word. A said entrepreneur is a person that unwillingly behaves as an entrepreneur and therefore is not so happy about it.
Crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe, YouCaring, and Generosity are full of said entrepreneurs. Here, the amount of people asking money for unexpected medical expenses is striking. It isn't too much of a surprise then, the fact that more money were raised on GoFundMe than on Kickstarter.
And that almost 70% of the US crowdfunding donations were offered to a person in need. While some users fill their profile only with a short blurb, some other include professional shot videos or intimate pictures of their lives, sometimes depicting medical treatment.
For her campaign, Katie McFarland, Choose YouCaring. Katie is a young Arkansan suffering from Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, who published Picture of Herself While Hospitalized, together with financial summaries of her medical expenses. The three dimension of the precarious described by political theorist,
Isabel Loret, who exists in these medical campaigns. First, the ineluctable precariousness of life, characterized by the unpredictability of accident and illness. Second, precarity, which is both a discursive frame to socially address precariousness and a means of creating hierarchies of need.
That in the case of crowdfunding, are mediated by different scales of visibility. Finally, governmental precarization. The governing and self-governing through insecurity, which include the erosion of welfare state form of protections, like universal healthcare.
And thus implies the destabilization of the ones that require them. The success of these personal crowdfunding campaigns is strictly related to the user ability to operate as a media company, acting simultaneously as a copywriter, a photographer, a social media manager, and an accountant.
Often, the platform themselves offer tutorials and tips to improve the quality of a campaign. Sometimes including extremely generic suggestions, such as avoiding blurry pictures. A title needs to be catchy in order to stand out from the plethora of running campaigns. In this scenario, the access to an informal means of protection against
emergencies turns into a race where online media literacy is a valuable competitive advantage. In a recent investigation for The Esquire, journalist Luke O'Neill draws a direct parallel between medical
crowdfunding and the ecosystem of tech entrepreneurship. Here, O'Neill sarcastically associates the presentation of GoFundMe users' medical history to the stereotypical narrative of tech startups. Implicitly revealing a similarity between an appeal to charitable spirits and a pitch to a venture capital firm.
While reading O'Neill's piece, I was reminded of a campaign which effectively combined personal necessity, the amassing of relational capital given by virality, and the strategic use of media literacy. In 2015, the boy who impersonated the success kid meme,
now eight years old, took advantage of his online popularity to fund the transplant of his father's kidney. Significantly on the verge, the news was published under the category of entertainment. I'd like to borrow for a moment the startup lingo to discuss some of the attempts to disrupt precarization and the dilemmas related to this effort.
While precarity is generally understood as a mixture of diverse form of instability and insecurity, Rosalind Gill and Andy Pratt suggest that the term can also refer to original modes of political struggle.
This is the case of Sanprecario, an icon that made its first appearance in 2004 and became an anti-literal meme against the exacerbation of labor precarity. Sanprecario exploited and subverted the deep Catholic roots of Italy, producing a mass of devotees and its own heretic liturgy.
A couple of years later, the My Creativity Network, a group formed around a series of events that took place in the Netherlands, proposed a reality check of Richard Florida idealistic image of the creative class. Instead of focusing on notion like empowerment and autonomy, the group discussed self exploitation, insecurity, and
the emergence of a creative underclass. Nowadays, more than a decade after this effort, the prevalent image of the precarious subject in the Italian media landscape is an unflattering one. The above comic strip allegorically illustrates it.
Being precarious means walking on a tightrope placed above the quick sense of unemployment, having to find a balance between subjugation and deference. Given the pervasive entrepreneurial pressure to think strategically of one's own personal brand, building social cohesion around
the acknowledgement of shared forms of precarity is not an easy task. In other words, not many people would comfortably identify as precarious on LinkedIn or even Facebook. Bringing precarity to the table is often understood as whining, and as we have taught, whining is for losers.
These losers are generally the so-called millennials, also categorized as lazy and entitled. Millennials should really take a leaf from the book of actual entrepreneurs who never complain and get things done. To summarize, the state of things causes people not to come out as
precarious, but to be outed as one. Is there a possibility to combine compulsory creative entrepreneurialism with genuine expression of precarity? In other words, it is possible to do PR through precarity and against precarization. To answer this question, I'd like to go back to the crowd funding stories
I mentioned. Last February, Katie McFarlane attended a public meeting with a senator who advocated the repeal of the Affordable Care Act. She took the floor and explained that without such measure, her life would be at risk. Of course, the media attention that McFarlane got,
thanks to her intervention, had a positive effect on the donation to her campaign. But at the same time, her story becomes somehow symbolic of all the patience endangered by ill-advised policy making. Needing to differentiate himself from the other graduates campaigning on crowdfunding platform, Clement Nokos, again, decided to create a podcast.
Initially focused on the grinds of his personal journey as an intern in New York City, the podcast soon turned into an instrument of advocacy against unpaid internship. In one of the latest episodes, Nokos interviewed Natalie Berger and David Leo Hyde, a duo that organized an extremely effective,
probably many of you know this, an extremely effective action to call attention to the issue of unpaid internships. Given the steep cost of living in a city like Geneva, Leo would carry out his work as unpaid intern at the United Station while living in a tent.
Here we see Hyde, who is currently shooting a documentary on unpaid internship together with Berger, speaking about the action in the context of a TEDx, a conference format born in the Silicon Valley and characterized by a highly recognizable aesthetics and a very profitable business model.
The cases I discuss denote a high degree of ambiguity emerging when entrepreneurialism meets precarity. Far from being uniquely the result of one's own passion, entrepreneurially performed creative undertakings are increasingly becoming an obligation.
More and more people reluctantly join the ranks of the anthropocariat, a novel kind of creative underclass whose very medium is constituted by its members' personal necessities. Thank you.
Stay there. We still have two or three minutes for answer questions. If you have any, please, if you can dim the light a little so I can see the audience, please raise your hand if you have any questions.
My God, no questions. I can't believe it. Oh, yes, there is one. Very good. Oh, okay. Could you say a bit more specifically, why is this anthropocariat emerging right now?
Like, why didn't it emerge 20 years ago? Do you think the main driver was the internet, or are there other factors? Thank you for this question. I mean, it's not easy to somehow define a clear sort of linear history of, like, this entrepreneurial pressure. But already in the 70s, Michel Foucault was speaking about the entrepreneur of the self.
And I think that because of the crisis, and as well, the kind of big value that now has in terms of media presence, like entrepreneurship as on like big platforms, like the New York Times. So we always somehow sort of presented with the work of genius entrepreneurs.
So this became like a very clear role model. And I think a lot of difference made the fact that these entrepreneurs are not anymore like the gray sort of just managing capital.
But they are also the one bringing creative disruption. And again, we find the link between creativity and entrepreneurship that somehow emerges then in a grassroots level as a sort of enforcement. I hope this somehow, thank you.
Okay, I see another one more question. I'm coming to you. Okay, you keep the microphone. Okay, so I missed the first five minutes, so maybe you mentioned this already, and so I'll try to give the question anyway.
Would you think of the popularity of solutions like, I mean, Uber and all of the sharing economies, companies that empower people to become entrepreneurs on their own terms with something they already own, which might be a car, an apartment for Airbnb, and so to say,
subsidize something that is not producing any value if it stays there, like a car or an apartment, and that's the easy way this company will actually allow you to become an entrepreneur, but you're not, because you're doing something that would be an employee position in other times.
So where do you see this going in the future, this sharing economy companies? What is their role in this, if there is one? Well, I'm not very experienced with the case of Uber, but I have several friends who work in, I live in Rotterdam, works for Deliveroo. And what I see there is the fact that this concept
of the entrepreneurial, like this strict combination, happens also at the legal level, because they are actually self-employed. So it's not just a matter of propaganda, but there is something happening also in the legal way as one person represents itself. And I think that is the most dangerous aspect going on right now,
like normalizing self-employment, even if there is clearly a subordinate relationship with the platform. So I would say I'm wary of both the narrative and the kind of legal substratum that is like defining those new practices.
Yes, we have time for one more question. Is there still hope? I mean, so many people dream of their dreams to become fulfilled.
And is there still a free market, or is it us applying for the money of old men to fulfill their dreams in the internet? OK, well, maybe keep it to the first part of the question,
because, of course, I was aware of presenting a sort of grim landscape. But I would like to bring attention to the cases I showed, like with crowdfunding. I think those little individual attempts to bring a more structural condition within, let's say, the drama of having to ask money for your medical situation
is something very heroic. And I think those cases show that, I mean, there is not so much of a possibility of withdrawal, but we need to sort of embrace the kind of ambiguity
of being within this kind of settings, but still bringing up not only our own demands, but a more structural one. So that is where I see the hope. It's not like fighting the system from within, but I think those stories are somehow inspiring,
to use another term borrowed from the Silicon Valley again, misused a bit. Thank you for the question. OK, thank you very much, Serviu. Please give another round of applause. Thank you.