We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Lecture 18: Radical Reactions

00:00

Formal Metadata

Title
Lecture 18: Radical Reactions
Title of Series
Part Number
18
Number of Parts
26
Author
License
CC Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 USA:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
Language

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Genre
Abstract
This is the second quarter of the organic chemistry series. Topics covered include: Fundamental concepts relating to carbon compounds with emphasis on structural theory and the nature of chemical bonding, stereochemistry, reaction mechanisms, and spectroscopic, physical, and chemical properties of the principal classes of carbon compounds. Index of Topics: 01:30 - General Features of Radical Reactions 01:54 - Reaction of a Radical X with a C-H Bond 03:47 - Reaction of a Radical X with a C=C Bond 04:58 - Radical Mechanisms 06:40 - Halogenation of Alkanes 09:16 - Mechanism 1 27:05 - Mechanism 2 31:24 - Selectivity and Stability 43:52 - Radical Substitution of Benzylic and Allylic Hydrogens
Chemical reactionHydrogenHalogenationAlkaneBenzylCarbon (fiber)ChlorineAllylThermoformingElectronActivation energyRadical (chemistry)ÜbergangszustandHaloalkaneMethylchloridBy-productFunctional groupEndotherme ReaktionExtractAlkeneProtonationMethylgruppeVinylverbindungenSetzen <Verfahrenstechnik>River sourceWalkingMethanisierungFood additiveOctane ratingConcentrateChemical compoundWine tasting descriptorsSunscreenChain (unit)Calcium hydroxideBiosynthesisGlassesStereoselectivityElectronic cigaretteHydrogen bondBromideBiomolecular structureCarbokationAtomChemische SyntheseExotherme ReaktionReactivity (chemistry)MixtureBenzyl bromidePeroxideInitiation (chemistry)Wave propagationMoleculeCombine harvesterProcess (computing)Human body temperatureLeft-wing politicsMetabolic pathwayRadical (chemistry)Organische ChemieEthaneEthylgruppeGesundheitsstörungLone pairButylWeaknessProteinkinase AElektrolytische DissoziationCalculus (medicine)Hydrochloric acidMolecularityAtomic numberHeteroatomRekombinante DNSPenning trapSubstitutionsreaktionChemistryCommon landPropionaldehydChemical elementStuffingMetalBenzoic acidChloridePolymorphism (biology)AreaPainMatchIonenbindungWhiskyPeriodateAmmoniumButyraldehydeStorage tankYield (engineering)OrganochlorideOrigin of replicationActive siteMeat analogueSilicon dioxidePipetteSpaltflächeElimination reactionConformational isomerismIsotopenmarkierungCompliance (medicine)MineralGravelDyeCell divisionChloroformComputer animation
Transcript: English(auto-generated)
So what it's looking like, what it's looking like, we'll see how it goes, so everybody knows we have a midterm coming up, it looks like it's going to be through chapter 15 for the midterm.
This is going to be a really hard midterm. And so a lot of synthesis, so last year we had spec plus this stuff, and so last year we had spec plus this stuff and so I couldn't ask as much synthesis because spec takes time, right? There's no spec on this test, so that means there's going to be more synthesis.
So what you want to do is you want to do as much synthesis as you can. So do the Sapling synthesis, jump straight at the end of each chapter, there's a synthesis section where it mixes reactions from all the chapters, you want to do that.
Those are the things, you want practice and synthesis. Okay, questions anybody before we get started? Alright so chapter 15, really different. So we had a little bit of terminology we were talking about, structure of radicals,
some terminology, bromide ion, bromine atom, bromine molecule, let's talk about some general features of radical reactions. Because we're going to have some mechanisms in this chapter, two. Two possible mechanisms from this chapter and three possible reactions from this chapter.
So there's three reactions we're going to take away and use in synthesis, there's two possible mechanisms from this chapter. Alright so radicals undergo two common reactions, they react with sigma bonds and they add to pi bonds. Here's what the arrow pushing looks like. You actually have seen this before, it was in one of the chapters in 51A.
When we were introducing reactivity we talked about homolytic bond cleavage, heterolytic bond cleavage, I didn't really emphasize it because I think this is a whole world unto itself, radical chemistry, the arrows are really different so I didn't really have
students have to learn that. Okay so the arrow pushing is completely different. So now remember when we're doing this reaction we're breaking the carbon hydrogen bond homolytically, that means one electron goes to this carbon, the other electron is going to combine with the unpaired electron on X and it looks like they're kind of
combining midair, okay, that's the way we draw the arrows for that. And then once you do that you get a CH3 radical plus HX.
So whenever we're breaking a bond in radical chemistry we're going to break it homolytically,
one electron goes to carbon, one electron goes to hydrogen, the electron that belongs to hydrogen, hydrogen keeps that electron and it combines with this unpaired electron to make a new HX bond. So once we have those two electrons we have a new bond and that's the bond right here. So that's one type of arrow pushing and then the second type is where a radical attacks
a carbon-carbon double bond and we're going to see both types.
Alright so again we're going to break the pi bond, the carbon-carbon pi bond homolytically. So one electron's going to go to this carbon, the other electron from this carbon on the right is going to combine and it looks like it's combining midair to make an
a new sigma bond. So that's the arrow pushing and all of the mechanisms that we do in this chapter are going to be some combination of that arrow pushing.
So the radical goes right here. So notice when we're doing these radical processes here, we start with a radical, we end with a radical. We start with a radical, we end with a radical, okay? Alright so radical mechanisms have three parts. So very likely that I will put a radical mechanism.
I'll give you more details on Monday. And you have to put things into the right spot. So there is an initiation that can be one step or it can be multiple steps. So there's initiation, there's propagation, and there's termination.
And so if I give you a radical mechanism on this upcoming midterm, I will have this already written for you. Initiation, I will have it propagation, and I will have it termination. And there's reactions and there's problems in Sapling Chapter 15 where they have you categorize reactions as initiation, propagation, and termination.
And I'll show you what to look for for that. But if you have the right reaction and you put it in the wrong spot, you don't get points for it. So you have to be able to recognize what type you have, what type of step you have. So initiation reactive intermediate is generated. So in an initiation we start with something that's not a radical and we break the bond homolitically
and we make two radicals. That's the initiation. And sometimes that takes a couple steps to do that. Propagation, the reactive intermediate reacts with a stable molecule to form another reactive intermediate and the chain continues until the supply of reactants is exhausted or the reactive intermediate is destroyed. So this radical chain, so it's like every time the reaction, we get one molecule reacting,
then it starts the chain again. And so every time it does the process it's another link in the chain. And termination steps are side reactions that destroy reactive intermediates and tend to slow or stop the reaction. So we'll see examples of each of these. I first want to talk about halogenation
and then we'll look at that mechanism. Chlorine or bromine will react with alkanes in the presence of lighter heat or added peroxide to give alkyl halides. So this is the first reaction that we want to talk about. And this is an important reaction because it allows us to take an alkane that is completely unreactive
and once we put a chlorine on that alkane, now we have a functional group and now we can turn that into other functional groups. In all ways that we've learned. So we have an alkyl halide, we can do reactions from chapter seven, chapter eight, chapter nine, chapter 10, chapter 11, and chapter 12, right? If we just have ethane, for example,
there's nothing we can do with it, it doesn't have a functional group. So this allows us to put a functional group on an unreactive molecule. So here's an example here. This is methane plus chlorine and you get a big mixture here. This is high temperature, starts this reaction,
high temp, light, usually a light of a specific frequency or an initiator. And so the initiators that we're going to be using in this class are usually peroxides.
So this peroxide is a free radical initiator or just a radical initiator. All right, so you need the chlorine, you need high temperature, heat, or light. Now what I normally do on my exams
is I will show H new and that's a trigger to you to make you think, okay, this means it's a reaction from chapter 15, it's a radical reaction, and that helps you out. Because I'm sure as of right now all these reactions are swimming in your head right now and it's kind of hard to keep them straight in some ways.
The second example uses bromine and this is light and temperature to get this reaction to go, so this is not necessarily easy to do. And this reaction is much more selective, we'll talk about why coming up. You actually only get one product here.
So chlorination not as selective, we'll see that coming up. Bromination much more selective. All right, so this is a radical chain reaction. And I'm going to do the mechanism for example one and then we're going to do an abbreviated mechanism
for example two. We'll do both of them. And I'm not going to show, I'm not going to show formation of all of these products. I'm just going to show you a few here. Okay, sorry about that, I went the wrong way.
Okay, initiation is where the radical is formed to start the process going. In order for our free radical chain reaction to happen you only need one radical to start. Okay, and if that radical sticks around a long time, I mean if it's there and it's going to create
new radicals that reaction will keep on going. So it's not, when you do a radical reaction you're not hitting it with light and all the radicals are forming at the same time. It's one molecule at a time and every time you complete the reaction you get another link in the chain. So for a radical form, and this is going to always be
where we break a weak bond. All right, so here's some examples in the top corner of weak bonds. So notice bond association energies are all really universally low here.
Fluorine-fluorine bond 38, chlorine-chlorine 59, bromine-bromine 46, iodine-iodine bond 36, peroxide 51, this is tert-butyl peroxide, ditert-butyl peroxide 38. And what is something these all have in common? Besides the fact that they have
small bond association energies, what do they all have in common? Well, I think I heard it. Both of these atoms have lone pairs and they're right next to each other. Okay, so this has lone pairs, that has lone pairs,
and they're right next to each other. And so what happens with those lone pairs is they want to, they repel each other. And so they want to move further away because there's electron-electron repulsion. And when they move further away, that lengthens the bond and makes it weaker, right? So this goes all the way back to 51A.
Strong bonds are short bonds, weak bonds are longer bonds. So the electron-electron repulsion from those lone pairs is going to want to make those things pull away from each other and it's going to weaken the bond. So that's what's going on. So let's throw some lone pairs on here. So you could be reminded of that.
Having too much fun drawing lone pairs here. So good thing, good point to make about weak bonds here.
I like this because I can actually write these a little faster than I can with a pen for the transparencies, how about that? Okay, you see a whole lot of lone pairs going on. So that makes a good point. So what we have is two heteroatoms.
And the other thing that's really good is that when I have my hand, my hand is completely covering this and it's not covering it at all up there. So that's another thing I like about this tablet here. So two heteroatoms bonded together,
both with lone pairs. So that makes it for a weaker bond
and a weaker bond is easier to break. Okay, so when we have chlorine, so chlorine, chlorine, that's on our weak bonds. So the radical is formed and so we're gonna make a chlorine-chlorine bond and we're gonna break it homolytically. So we have chlorine.
So we start off in an initiation, we start off with a neutral molecule that's not a radical and we end up with two radicals. And that's what starts the process rolling.
So how do we know if something's in initiation step? We start off with something that's not a radical and we create new radicals. That's how you know if it's initiation. Propagation, so what's gonna happen here is we have methane, so I'll draw methane and then I'm gonna draw out one of the bonds for methane and the chlorine radical
that we formed in the initiation. Now we're gonna do the same arrow pushing we did on the previous page. The chlorine radical is going to abstract that hydrogen but remember when we do radical reactions we're gonna break each bond homolytically.
So we break that carbon-hydrogen bond. Carbon gets one electron, hydrogen gets the one electron. The electron that hydrogen gets combines with the unpaired electron in chlorine to make a new hydrogen-chlorine bond.
So we get hydrochloric acid as our side product. And then the methyl radical that we just formed,
it's gonna grab a chlorine. So we're gonna break this chlorine-chlorine bond homolytically with the electron from the chlorine on the left is gonna combine with the unpaired electron on the methyl radical.
And we're going to get our product.
And that's the other thing that we're gonna see in a propagation step. So that's one chain, that's one link in the chain. And as you can see that what we've done here is we've regenerated the radical that we started with. So this is gonna come in and it's going, there's a link in the chain and it's gonna come in and it's gonna do it again.
It's gonna keep cycling through. So we regenerate the radical we started with. Yep?
You can and I'm gonna show that in a, that's a termination step, okay? I'm gonna show that in just a second. So we regenerate the radical that you started with.
And the other thing I want you to notice is that we've always keeping the same number of radicals in propagation steps. So in this one we start with a radical, we end with a radical. Here we start with a radical and a neutral molecule, we end with a radical. I mean, or a non, a molecule with all electrons paired.
So start with a radical, end with a radical. Start with a radical, end with a radical. So when you're sorting those problems and sapling into boxes, that's what you're looking for. The number of radicals stays the same. One here, one here, one here, one here.
In the first one we started with none and made two. That's what makes that an initiation step. So note, the number of radicals stays the same
in propagation steps. So definitely want to make sure that you look for that. Now termination is really the opposite of initiation.
In initiation you start with something that's not a radical and you break it into two radicals. In termination you combine two radicals and you make it into something that's not a non-radical. That's a termination step. So that's what you're going to look for when you're doing your sorting.
So pretty much any radical that we have here can combine with any other radical. So for example, we could have a chlorine radical,
and this is to answer your question, combining with a methyl radical. So it looks like that. We could have a, that would give you the product that we're going to get anyway.
It's just made by a different pathway. That would give you methyl chloride. We could have two methyl radicals combining. That would give you ethane.
So that would give you ethane. You can also have two chlorine radicals recombine.
All right, so these end up being some side products that you get.
Well, the first one's not a side product. The third one's not a side product, but certainly ethane is not something that we're trying to make. Okay, and so usually we don't get very much of these termination steps, because let's imagine that we start off
with one molecule of chlorine breaking, okay? So let's imagine we have just one molecule do this. So we only have two chlorines here, right? Two chlorine radicals. What are the chances of those two chlorine radicals? They're going to be stirring in that reaction. They're going to be moving around, doing this reaction over and over again in the propagation.
The chance of those two actually interacting and colliding and recombining is very small. So there will be a lot more propagation than there will be termination, but you still do get these side products, okay? And so that's why it's not a very complete, it's not a very clean reaction,
because we don't want to, no one's going to want to have to separate all of these possible products here. So you see we have a lot here. We have methyl chloride. Now, you can imagine, to form methylene, to form this one right here, we would just, a radical would come and remove another proton from methyl chloride.
That's how we would get some of this. To get this, this is chloroform. We would have a radical come and remove another hydrogen from carbon here. And then that's how we would form this. You could do that four times. You could replace all four hydrogens with chlorine. And here, this product right here, would be from the ethyl that we formed
in our termination step. So you get a lot of, it's kind of a messy reaction here. So the competing propagation step here,
I'll show formation of the dichloromethane here. So you can see what I'm talking about here. If this comes in and grabs a proton, instead of from methane, it grabs a proton from methyl chloride,
then you form this radical. And now what's that radical gonna do? That radical is going to come and grab a, it's gonna come in right here, where are we? It's gonna come in here, it's gonna grab a chlorine, and that's how you get dichloromethane. Let's show that.
So kind of a messy reaction here. Notice my single-headed arrows here.
Okay, everybody see how that's formed? So what did we see? We said about 80%, we get about 80% methyl chloride in this reaction, and we get 20%
of these other little side products that have to be separated. One of the ways to get this reaction to go a little bit better and a little bit cleaner is to keep the concentration of these side products low, keep concentration low by using a large excess of methane.
All right, so since methane's a gas,
you would use a large excess of methane, and then that will increase the amount of methyl chloride you get, and some of these other little side products will be much less. Question about that mechanism, anybody?
All right, so as we say on the next page, this isn't a very good reaction because it's not very clean. It's not the best way to synthesize alkyl halides. There are better ways, but it's still useful because it is the only way to convert an inert alkane into a reactive compound.
It's the only way that we know to take an inert alkane, like propane, ethane, methane, and add a functional group on it. Once we put a chlorine or a bromine on there, now we can take that and do all the other reactions we know that we can do with alkyl halides. But until we do that, we're stuck.
So this is, even though it's not a very good reaction, it's the only thing we have. So another better way to synthesize alkyl chlorides, we learned in chapter 10, right?
If we do it this way, we don't get a million little side products. So that's what we would do if we wanted to make an alkyl halide. For alkyl bromides, we would use HBr.
So there are better ways. What's the difference here though? Are we starting with a compound that doesn't have a functional group? No, we're starting with a compound that's an alkene
that has a functional group. It has a functional group that can be converted into other functional groups. So this is different. It's a better way to make alkyl halides, but our starting material has a functional group right here. There's a functional group, that alkene's a functional group, and so we're just converting it
to another functional group. If we have an alkene, we have no functional group. This has no functional groups. So we can't take base and remove that proton, because it has a pKa of 50. So this is the only way that we have to put a functional group on there, and then once we do that, we can convert it into other things.
Questions so far, anybody? Let's look at the second mechanism. This one's a lot cleaner. So we take tertiary butane, bromine, light, and heat,
and let's draw our product. Single product here, we don't get a lot of different products here. All right, so initiation, a radical form, we always break a weak bond. We got a weak bond here.
Did I not leave you time? Sorry about that. Okay, so we're going to break a weak bond. That's easy, break a weak bond homolitically. We start off with a non-radical. We end up with two radicals.
Now, again, I want to make the point that not all of the molecular bromine bonds are going to break. Just a few of them. Not all of them are going to break.
We only really require one to break, and that's enough to get all of our starting material converted into products. So propagation, and I drew some of these already to make it a little easier. I should probably draw that bond a little longer. So we go here.
Okay, so tert-butyl radical plus HBr,
and then the tert-butyl radical comes in. It's really the same mechanism here. Grabs a bromine. So we still have molecular bromine. We still got this bromine in here that hasn't been broken apart. And this is going to come and grab a bromine from that.
And when it does that, it forms our product. And we always want to look for this. It's going to regenerate the radical that we started with at propagation. So always the last step here is going to be regenerating the radical that we started with,
and definitely you want to look for that. So this one here, that's what we started with. And now it's going to cycle back through again. So most of the bromine is going to be broken apart this way, not this way.
Questions? I hear a lot of, oh, what did I do? Oh, I forgot, yeah, yeah, yeah, thank you. I knew I did. It means one of two things. I've either scrolled too quickly or I made a mistake.
How about that? That's looking too much like a dog. There, I'll just try to fix that. How about that? Is that better? Okay. Regenerate the radical that we started with.
All right, termination. Radicals destroyed by recombining. Recombine any two radicals here you fill in. There's three possible. And by the way, on the test,
I will have an initiation section, I will have a propagation, I will have a termination, and what I always do on the test is I say, show me one termination. That's all I want to see. You don't have to draw all three, I just want to see one. So whatever one you think you like the best, that's what you can include. All right, so possible mechanism.
Radical halogenation. I will have some sort of alkane. I will have either bromine or chlorine and light and heat and all of that. That's one possible mechanism for a midterm too.
All right, I want to say something about selectivity. Very selective with bromine, right? It turns out that bromine is a much more selective reagent than chlorine and we're going to explain why that is. Okay, so let's look at this. We've got one tertiary hydrogen.
Let's remind ourselves what a tertiary hydrogen is. A tertiary hydrogen is bonded to a tertiary carbon. That carbon is bonded to three other carbons so it's a tertiary carbon. And we have how many primary hydrogens?
Nine equivalent tertiary hydrogens. Or primary hydrogens, nine primary hydrogens. So we've got nine to one ratio of primary to tertiary hydrogens and we still get no primary hydrogens abstracted.
We get no product that comes from a primary hydrogen being extracted. So statistically, you are nine times as likely
but you don't get any. You don't, what do you not get any? You don't get any primary hydrogen abstracted so you don't get any of this product here. This product would result from a
primary hydrogen being extracted. Any one of those nine would give you this product. And you don't get any of that so let's put a big X through that. None of that product is formed.
So we need to do, we need to explain why that is. There's two factors that we need to talk about to explain this. Number one is the relative stabilities of the radicals formed and so we have tertiary radical, more stable than secondary radical, more stable than primary, more stable than methyl radical.
Okay so if we remove one of those primary hydrogens we're forming a primary radical. And so maybe not surprising that we don't get any of that formed at all because we know that primary radicals are very unstable. Similar to carbocation primaries, very unstable.
The other thing that's not obvious is that we have to look at the ease at which the different hydrogens are removed and in order to do this you can look at the bond dissociation energies and energy of activation. So we'd actually have to do some calculations. We're not going to do any calculations but I want to show you what the relative rates of hydrogen abstraction by halogen atoms for bromine.
Primary is one to 82 to 1,640. So tertiary, forming a tertiary radical is 1,640 times more likely than forming a primary with a bromine radical.
And since we only have a nine to one ratio there's not a chance statistically that we're going to be removing one of those primary hydrogens. The selectivity for tertiary is way too great. Chlorine on the other hand, we're going to just relative rates, we'll have one for primary, 2.5 and four.
So if we did this exact same reaction with chlorine we will get some of the primary product, right? And that's because there's only a four to one selectivity for tertiary over primary is four to one and we have nine times the number of primary carbons
so we will get primary here. So much less selective. And you're beginning to see why I tend to favor bromine because it's a better leaving group, it works better in this reaction and it's better in a lot of different reactions so I tend to favor it. All right so why is the bromine atom so much more selective?
It seems like it just should have to do with carbocation stability but it's not. Remember we're doing other things in this reaction. It turns out if you compare transition states and activation energies for the abstraction of a hydrogen atom by bromine radical versus a chlorine radical you will find that. Number one, abstraction of a hydrogen atom by bromine
is endothermic while abstraction of a hydrogen atom by chlorine is exothermic. This sounds crazy difficult, it's really not that bad. And number two, the transition states for the endothermic bromination have a larger energy difference than those for the exothermic chlorination even though, and that shouldn't be on that page,
but even though the energy difference in the products is the same in both reactions. It's like whoa, wrap your head around that, right? So let's see if I can explain this graphically here for you. So what we said on the previous page is abstraction of a hydrogen atom by bromine
is endothermic while abstraction of a hydrogen atom by chlorine is exothermic. So here is alkane and chlorine, exothermic. So this radical here is down here. And then if we do bromine it's endothermic so this radical is higher in energy.
Okay so let's label that. This is exothermic reaction and this is endothermic reaction.
The rate of reaction is going to have to do with the height of that energy barrier. What do we know about the structure of the transition state in an exothermic reaction? Does it look more like the reactant for that reaction or the product?
It's closer in energy to this and we're starting off with one thing. We're starting off with one thing, we have a very exothermic reaction, the difference in energy between these transition states is so close because it looks more like the alkane than it does the radical. Very, very close in energy. So what that means is that when you do the chlorination
you're going to be equally likely to take all three of these pathways. Yes, the red pathway down here is lower in energy but these are all very close by. So they're all accessible. Over here we have an endothermic reaction. By Hammond's postulate we know that
in an endothermic reaction the transition state looks more like the products of that reaction and so since there's a big energy difference here between these three products there's also going to be a big energy difference here between the transition states. And so you can start to see now that with bromination this lower energy pathway
is so low and these are much too high for it to overcome that energy barrier. Okay so all the molecules are going to take that pathway because there's a big energy difference here. Here there's not, it's a small energy difference. So we definitely want to label that a little better here. Let's label that.
So exothermic reaction therefore the transition state resembles, and we're only looking at one step here. Transition state resembles reactants more than products.
In an endothermic reaction the transition state resembles products more than reactants.
And so if you look here this is a really small energy difference
between these guys. These are two tiny little arrows. I don't know if you're going to be able to see those but very small energy difference.
It is less than one k cal per mole. So three very accessible transition states and so you're going to get a big mixture here. And then here these guys here
this is a large energy difference. And what do we have here? This is about, I've maybe exaggerated a little bit more.
This is two k cals per mole. And that's enough that you, so if you add two k cals per mole, if you've got tertiary versus primary that's two k cals per mole plus two,
we're talking about four k cals per mole. That's a really large energy difference for transition states. So we have the large energy difference here. This one has a much bigger energy difference.
Therefore the rates of the reactions will be markedly different. And this is a really good example of the point
that when you're talking about rates of reaction it does not have to do with the intermediates. These intermediates and these intermediates have the same energy difference. And if it was only because of that then we would have the same product outcome whether it was bromine and chlorine. It has to do with the height of the transition state here.
That's what's key. All right so here's an example here to show you what this means. Difference wise in selectivity. So here we have bromination, here we have chlorination. With bromination we get one product, 82%. With chlorination we get 26% this product,
22% this product, 22% this product, 14% this product, and 17%. And you can actually predict these percentages by taking into account the difference in selectivity of chlorine versus the number of hydrogens that you have
and you can actually calculate these differences. The textbook we had before this had you do that. This textbook doesn't have it so I'm not gonna have you learn that. You'll be glad about that. You're very glad. It's not that hard but you're glad.
Questions on bromination of alkanes or chlorination of alkanes. That's reaction number one from this chapter. Radical substitution of benzylic and allic,
that's reaction number two in this chapter. We are going to skip the mechanism here but you need to know the reaction for synthesis.
Why am I having you skip the mechanism? It's a confusing mechanism. It has both single-headed arrows and double-headed arrows and it's just so hard to wrap your head around when you're just learning organic chemistry for the first time. How do I know that? Because I remember having to memorize this mechanism.
And a lot of mechanisms that I didn't really need to memorize. So I'm selectively having you memorize certain things, as little as possible though. So we're skipping the mechanism and you don't need to know that. Recall that allyl and benzyl radicals are both more stable than tertiary radicals.
We know they're more stable than radical the faster it can be formed. So a hydrogen bonded to either benzylic or allyl carbon can be preferentially be substituted in a halogenation reaction. So again, these guys are more stable than tertiary so that means that if you have a choice between removing a tertiary hydrogen or benzylic or allyl, benzylic or allyl will win.
So here's some examples here. Br2, we can make this radical right here. We won't form a primary radical, we'll only form that one.
And then if we carry that on, we will get benzyl bromide, a substituted benzyl bromide. So the bromine will go in the benzyl position, nowhere else can you put that bromine.
If we have allyl, then we can put, we have a choice between vinyl, hydrogen or allyl. Okay, so here's vinyl right here. Are we gonna form any of that? Not when we've got allyl that we can form, right? So that's way better. So that means that we can form the allyl radical
and we can convert that into allyl bromine. So who sees a competing reaction that can form with this, these two?
Who sees another reaction that's competing with that? From chapter 10. Yeah, and you know bromination of an alkene is an extremely fast reaction. You guys did this in the lab, didn't you? How fast was it? It was really fast. So how are we gonna do this
when we can do this just as fast? Okay, so I'm gonna give you a different reagent for this. We're not gonna use this, we're gonna give you a special reagent for this that I want you to use instead. And that's because we have competing reactions here. We can, with bromine we can form a bromonium ion.
Let's remember this. We don't want to forget this, this is midterm two material, right? Not to bring up an unpleasant subject, but you know, right? Nobody likes taking tests.
In graduate school, in chemistry, you take one year of classes and then you work in a lab for the rest of the time while you earn your PhD. And I remember thinking at the time, I've only got one more year of classes in me, I cannot do this for two years.
I just was so burned out on taking tests. So I haven't had to take a test since then and it's a beautiful thing. Because nobody likes taking tests. All right, so remember this, okay? So that's a competing reaction. That's a competing, very fast reaction. And so really, let's not use bromine for this.
Even though Smith uses this a lot in synthesis, I want you to not use this reagent. And that's the reason why. We'll stop right there and we will finish chapter 15 next time. So this is the reagent I want you to use instead.