Challenges of indoor mapping formats
Formal Metadata
| Title | Challenges of indoor mapping formats |
|
| Title of Series | |
| Part Number | 42 |
| Number of Parts | 193 |
| Author | |
| License | You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor. |
| Identifiers | |
| Publisher | |
| Release Date | |
| Language | |
Content Metadata
| Subject Area | |
| Genre | |
| Abstract | New data formats for mapping the indoor spaces of buildings have been appearing lately - the shift from Autocad files to BIM systems and the adoption of OGC IndoorGML should mean a better standardization of the data.
The reality from the trenches is somehow more grim - indoor mapping data is still in silos, hasn't seen any big breakthroughs in creating and editing, and most of the challenges remain.
Sometimes a format or specification covers a very specific and non-general use case, and sometimes the generality of a format incurs in a great overhead for every simple use case. Sometimes new concepts are really old concepts from a different industry but with a new name.
This talk will review what's good, what's bad and what's ugly with indoor mapping. |
|