Alpine Nature Conservation and Resource Management - TIB AV-Portal

Alpine Nature Conservation and Resource Management

00:00

13

Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (RCC)

Hardenberg, Graf Wilko von

Formale Metadaten

Titel

Alpine Nature Conservation and Resource Management

Autor

Hardenberg, Graf Wilko von

Lizenz

CC-Namensnennung - keine kommerzielle Nutzung - keine Bearbeitung 3.0 Deutschland:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt in unveränderter Form zu jedem legalen und nicht-kommerziellen Zweck nutzen, vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.

Identifikatoren

10.5446/4479 (DOI)

Herausgeber

Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (RCC)

Erscheinungsjahr

Sprache

Produzent

Niepytalska, Marta

Produktionsjahr

2011

Produktionsort

Munich

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet

Genre

Abstract

Deutsch

Deutsch

Carson Fellow Wilko Graf von Hardenberg betrachtet die Entstehung und Entwicklung von Nationalparks in Europa und die daraus resultierenden Konflikte von Anwohnern und Organisationen. Er erklärt, dass jedes Land seinen Fokus auf verschiedene schützenswerte Gebiete und Angelegenheiten richtet. Klar erkennbar ist ein Unterschied zwischen West- und Osteuropa. Dies zeigen die kulturellen und symbolischen Unterschiede in den einzelnen Regionen. Wilko Graf von Hardenberg ist Umwelthistoriker mit Schwerpunkt auf soziopolitischen Aspekten der Naturwahrnehmung und Verwaltung im modernen Europa.

Englisch

Englisch

The development of national parks across transnational borders creates new boundariesand the conflicts which derive from the different claims of various local and national institutions. Carson Fellow Wilko Graf von Hardenberg researches European conservation management and the variety of tensions therein. By examining historical events in park communities and current policy measures, Graf von Hardenberg looks at European conservation measures in the larger context of global park management. Dr. von Hardenberg is currently the digital humanities resource specialist at the Rachel Carson Center.

Schlagwörter

Deutsch	Deutsch Alpen Naturschutz Nationalpark Europa Veraenderung von Landschaften
Englisch	Englisch conservation management national parks transnational borders

Transkript
Annotationen

Sprache

Text

Bild

00:17

Besprechung/Interview

00:29

Entwicklung <Photographie>GreiffingerBesprechung/Interview

01:15

Haspel <Textiltechnik>Computeranimation

01:23

HolztrocknungPatrone <Munition>GroßkampfschiffRinggeflechtBesprechung/Interview

02:07

Besprechung/Interview

02:16

Besprechung/Interview

02:28

ErsatzteilTackerBesprechung/Interview

03:22

ErsatzteilBesprechung/Interview

03:30

Besprechung/Interview

03:40

Berg <Bergbau>Besprechung/Interview

04:00

Besprechung/Interview

04:04

FehlprägungComputeranimationBesprechung/Interview

Transkript: Englisch(automatisch erzeugt)

00:20

I'm Wilko Graf von Harnberg. I'm currently the Digital Humanities Research Specialist at the Carson Centre and I used to be a Carson Fellow.

00:30

I'm studying the development of nature conservation in the Alpine Range. I'm interested in approaching a transnational point of view, discussing the

00:42

development of national parks in Italy, France, Switzerland, Austria and Germany. My main interest is conflicts. When you set up a national park, you create a boundary, a boundary which gives different rights within and without the national park.

01:02

This creates conflicts between the institutions creating a park and the local populations. Setting up a national park is about creating a border between inside and outside. Inside you have new rights, you create new kinds of crimes. The non-acceptance of the local population of these new crimes brings to conflict.

01:25

People used to have hunting rights or grazing rights on these territories and suddenly, usually suddenly, some national institution decides that this has to become a national park so it has to be protected.

01:40

And so many of these rights, including also fishing rights, get abolished from the state. So the local communities have the problem that they used to do things which I think are customary but aren't allowed anymore. This has led in many cases, mainly in the Italian case, which is the one which at this moment I still

02:05

know the best, to court cases in which the local population asked for their customary rights to be recognized by the state. The main finding in the trans-regional point of view, because I want to

02:23

go over the institutional study of national parks which are usually studied one by one. You study one national park, then you study the other. I try to compare them and try to compare the cultural and symbolic difference in different countries and different regions within these countries.

02:40

Because the apparent range is very diverse. It's diverse by cultures, it's diverse by landscapes and climate. And so I think that there are different conditions in which these parks arise. And one of my main findings at this point is that there is not a

03:01

cultural difference between Germanic and Latian approaches to nature conservation but rather an East-West divide. Where the parks in the Western part, say Switzerland, Western Italy and France, aimed at what has been called total conservation, so completely protecting the wilderness that was in that area.

03:21

While in the Eastern part, that would be Germany, Austria and Eastern Italy, it's more about protecting nice landscapes with less care for animals and wildlife. Looking at how these conflicts were managed in historic times, even under completely different kinds

03:42

of regimes like the fascist regime in Italy or afterwards the Nazi regime in Germany. Or in parallel, the weak democracy which was acting in France in those years may help to understand how to approach similar conflicts in other mountain areas even currently.

04:00

So I want to go over what has been called by some scholars policy amnesia. So the fact that we tend to forget that we already had some issues and already found ways to solve it or had worst cases, so very bad ways to try to solve it. So to try to avoid, to remake errors we already made.