We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Crowdmapping That Works

Formale Metadaten

Titel
Crowdmapping That Works
Serientitel
Anzahl der Teile
156
Autor
Mitwirkende
Lizenz
CC-Namensnennung 3.0 Unported:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt zu jedem legalen Zweck nutzen, verändern und in unveränderter oder veränderter Form vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
Identifikatoren
Herausgeber
Erscheinungsjahr
Sprache

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet
Genre
Abstract
Most geographers look to OpenStreetMap for the data. It is indeed unique, with many attempts at duplicating the idea failed. At its core is crowdmapping: making regular people improve the map. Not having the data, geographers look into that too. Tempting idea, isn't it - engage a crowd into collecting data you need, not spending a cent on teaching and salaries. Have them walk around and collect building entrances for you! Why not make cyclists review cycling lanes? Everybody has phones, let them measure signal quality all over Estonia. We don't have yellow pages, but sure people could help building a POI dataset? At least pointing things on a map should be easy and draw in a crowd? We have seen many businesses toying with this, and many not-for-profit projects. Most failing. The Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team still unmatched. Why does that happen? How do we ensure the data collected can be trusted? How do we get people to stay with us, and not leave after a few clicks? In this talk we'll look at a few past crowdmapping projects, learn what went well and what didn't, and derive a few pointers at how to get the data we need out of thin air (and people we don't know).
Schlagwörter