We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Does Logically Incoherent Decision-Making Really Have Negative Consequences?

Formale Metadaten

Titel
Does Logically Incoherent Decision-Making Really Have Negative Consequences?
Autor
Lizenz
CC-Namensnennung 3.0 Unported:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt zu jedem legalen Zweck nutzen, verändern und in unveränderter oder veränderter Form vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
Identifikatoren
Herausgeber
Erscheinungsjahr
Sprache

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet
Genre
Abstract
As explained in this video it is commonly assumed that logically incoherent decision-making is irrational and costly in that it can lead e.g. to a decrease in happiness or health. An example of this would be a patient reacting differently if doctors speak of a 90% success rate of surgery instead of a 10% failure rate for the same procedure. The purpose of the study presented here was to examine if there is proof in the existing literature that incoherent decision-making actually has negative consequences and is rightly seen as irrational. * GERD GIGERENZER is Director at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy, both in Berlin, Germany. This LT Publication is divided into the following chapters: 0:00 Question 2:13 Method 4:41 Findings 6:06 Relevance 10:29 Outlook