We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

Plone from the perspective of Orchard Core

Formale Metadaten

Titel
Plone from the perspective of Orchard Core
Serientitel
Anzahl der Teile
53
Autor
Mitwirkende
Lizenz
CC-Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt zu jedem legalen Zweck nutzen, verändern und in unveränderter oder veränderter Form vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
Identifikatoren
Herausgeber
Erscheinungsjahr
Sprache

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet
Genre
Abstract
I'm currently working with the Orchard CMS. It addresses many of the same issues as Plone: flexible content type definitions, workflow, fully customisable layout and theming, third-party module development, all with a strong through-the-web story. In many cases, I find the Orchard solutions form an interesting contrast to the Plone way, specifically in terms of content type definition, widgets, templating and layout. I'd like to look at Orchard from a Plone point of view: what is easier, what is lacking, what lessons can we take from another player in the same space. I will be looking at Orchard Core, the fully cross-platform rewrite that is in beta now. It uses a .NET document database working on any RDBMS (we use postgres and sqlite). Orchard is an open source (BSD 3-Clause) project, .Net, C#, started around 2009.