We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

The good and the bad sides of developing open source tools for neuroscience

Formale Metadaten

Titel
The good and the bad sides of developing open source tools for neuroscience
Serientitel
Anzahl der Teile
490
Autor
Lizenz
CC-Namensnennung 2.0 Belgien:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt zu jedem legalen Zweck nutzen, verändern und in unveränderter oder veränderter Form vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
Identifikatoren
Herausgeber
Erscheinungsjahr
Sprache

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet
Genre
Abstract
The reproducibility crisis has shocked the scientific community. Different papers describe this issue and the scientific community has taken steps to improve on it. For example, several initiatives have been founded to foster openness and standardisation in different scientific communities (e.g. the INCF[1] for the neurosciences). Journals encourage sharing of the data underlying the presented results, some even make it a requirement. What is the role of open source solutions in this respect? Where are the problems with open source projects in (neuro-)sciences? In this presentation I will address these questions at the example of the entirely open-source based workflow in our laboratory[2] and our efforts in developing generic solutions for storing metadata[3] as well as unifying data and metadata storage[4] that we take together with the German Neuroinformatics Node (G-Node[5]). [1] https://incf.org [2] https://github.com/bendalab [3] https://github.com/g-node/python-odml [4] https://github.com/g-node/nix [5] https://g-node.org