We're sorry but this page doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.
Feedback

It's Open Source

Formale Metadaten

Titel
It's Open Source
Untertitel
how could that possibly go wrong!?
Serientitel
Anzahl der Teile
295
Autor
Mitwirkende
Lizenz
CC-Namensnennung 3.0 Deutschland:
Sie dürfen das Werk bzw. den Inhalt zu jedem legalen Zweck nutzen, verändern und in unveränderter oder veränderter Form vervielfältigen, verbreiten und öffentlich zugänglich machen, sofern Sie den Namen des Autors/Rechteinhabers in der von ihm festgelegten Weise nennen.
Identifikatoren
Herausgeber
Erscheinungsjahr
Sprache

Inhaltliche Metadaten

Fachgebiet
Genre
Abstract
Migrating to opensource is a No-Go, some say... No support, No warranties, No sales reps, No help, just a bunch of Garage companies... or is it, migrating to opensource is a no brainer… No licenses, No costs? When evaluating a migration to opensource we should definitely consider all the points above, and while all the negative views are often used to spread FUD[1] by proprietary software vendors, seeing the absence of licensing costs as the main advantage of such a migration can and probably will lead to uninformed decisions and unexpected results. While it is true that an opensource solution has a generally much lower TCO[2], to effectively use opensource tools in an enterprise environment, other aspects like product ownership, responsibilities and [re-]training need to be considered to ensure a painless move to the world of No lock-in, agile projects and technological advantage. [1] Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt [2] Total Cost of Ownership
Schlagwörter