Introduction

Video thumbnail (Frame 0) Video thumbnail (Frame 337) Video thumbnail (Frame 427) Video thumbnail (Frame 691) Video thumbnail (Frame 819) Video thumbnail (Frame 933) Video thumbnail (Frame 1109) Video thumbnail (Frame 1448) Video thumbnail (Frame 1663) Video thumbnail (Frame 2032) Video thumbnail (Frame 2270) Video thumbnail (Frame 2362) Video thumbnail (Frame 2438) Video thumbnail (Frame 2544) Video thumbnail (Frame 2633)
Video in TIB AV-Portal: Introduction

Formal Metadata

Title
Introduction
Title of Series
Number of Parts
46
Author
License
CC Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 3.0 Germany:
You are free to use, copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
2017
Language
English

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Abstract
The term Climate Engineering (CE) specifically describes large-scale technical methods that can be used to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere or to reduce incoming solar radiation. Recently, some scientists and politicians have begun discussing the possibility of using CE to deal with climate change.

Related Material

modifying weather and climate is a very old dream of mankind so we have always tried to have good forecasts but also many attempts have been tried to influence weather like rain or avoid rain the real issue of climate
engineering did a very large-scale global scale was motivated by the
frustration of scientists but we have done so many IPCC reports climate assessment and giving recommendations what to do to avoid dangerous climate agent so far nothing visible has
happened that has led portraits and others to think through what else what
options might there be if politics and
society fails to really respond to to scientific advice and scientific knowledge Croton paper was published I
think in 2006 and it started some debate among scientists initially among national scientists so it was about the possible potential of Arizona injection of very high stratosphere and we thought
it is necessary to first study the possible scientific effects could it really work but we also think there's
lots of different aspects like legal issues governance issues who would be responsible who would say what is a good temperature we could be happy with who would monitor our to were detected at
any measure one would really deploy would undertake would we distribute winners and losers worldwide and this was a huge danger that has to be
controlled and that's a scientific
question we have to answer could it be controlled could we manage
this kind of redistribution of losers winners and there's a lot of background
knowledge that has to be generated
before society can decide do we want to live should we ever try that and I think that's a scientific responsibility to provide information for a good public debate
Feedback