Nonequilibrium manybody effects in driven nonlinear resonator arrays
Formal Metadata
Title 
Nonequilibrium manybody effects in driven nonlinear resonator arrays

Title of Series  
Author 

License 
CC Attribution  NonCommercial  ShareAlike 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal and noncommercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this license. 
Identifiers 

Publisher 

Release Date 
2012

Language 
English

Content Metadata
Subject Area  
Abstract 
We study the nonequilibrium behavior of optically driven dissipative coupled resonator arrays. Assuming each resonator is coupled with a twolevel system via a Jaynes–Cummings interaction, we calculate the manybody steady state behavior of the system under coherent pumping and dissipation. We propose and analyze the manybody phases using experimentally accessible quantities such as the total excitation number, the emitted photon spectra and photon coherence functions for different parameter regimes. In parallel, we also compare and contrast the expected behavior of this system assuming the local nonlinearity in the cavities is generated by a generic Kerr effect as described by the Bose–Hubbard (BH) model rather than a Jaynes–Cummings interaction. We find that the behavior of the experimentally accessible observables produced by the two models differs for realistic regimes of interactions even when the corresponding nonlinearities are of similar strength. We analyze in detail the extra features available in the Jaynes–Cummings–Hubbard (JCH) model originating from the mixed nature of the excitations and investigate the regimes where the BH approximation would faithfully match the JCH physics. We find that the latter is true for values of the light–matter coupling and losses beyond the reach of current technology. Throughout the study we operate in the weak pumping, fully quantum mechanical regime where approaches such as mean field theory fail, and instead use a combination of quantum trajectories and the time evolving block decimation algorithm to compute the relevant steady state observables. In our study we have assumed small to medium size arrays (from 3 up to 16 sites) and values of the ratio of coupling to dissipation rate g/γ ~ 20, which makes our results implementable with current designs in circuit QED and with near future photonic crystal set ups.

Related Material
Video is accompanying material for the following resource
00:00
Effects unit
Electric power distribution
Crystal structure
Phased array
Crystallographic defect
Particle physics
Photon
Photonic crystal
Separation process
HubbardModell
Flight simulator
LC circuit
Hose coupling
Quantum
Photonic crystal
Duty cycle
Nuclear reactor
Crystallographic defect
Effects unit
Automobile platform
Cocktail party effect
Plain bearing
Thermodynamic equilibrium
Optical cavity
Phase (matter)
Video
Quantum
01:07
Optics
Hot working
Phased array
Effects unit
Evapotranspiration
Lawn mower
Phased array
Access network
Fulling
Aerodynamics
Atomism
Joint
Spare part
HubbardModell
Polariton
Polariton
Mode of transport
02:15
Trajectory
Effects unit
Crystallization
Phased array
Photon
Matrix (printing)
Laser
Hose coupling
Quantum
Angeregter Zustand
Trajectory
Phased array
Arc lamp
Active laser medium
Power (physics)
Cartridge (firearms)
Atomism
Lungenautomat
Nanotechnology
Angeregter Zustand
Mode of transport
Ion
Burst (band)
Cylinder block
Quantum
Polarisierte Strahlung
03:18
Phased array
Photonic crystal
Ultra
Crystallization
Dipol
Photon
Particle
Volumetric flow rate
Fermion
Polariton
Laser
Polarisierte Strahlung
Triton <Physik>
03:35
Cartridge (firearms)
Effects unit
HubbardModell
Phased array
00:07
hello this is a Dirichlet prior written submission to interview so here we duties and workers d Nash Stephen Clarke and myself Tonga which was done by describing the kinds of structure as is it possible realization of tiny crystal geometry where defects in the crystal form leisure is in a sense of Britain's concur him in town between sites we use the molarity is publicly coupling each resonance site with a tunable system is described by James comes interaction the governing Hamiltonian for the total system here is known as the James coming some above the reactor several other promising technologies to realize time but a bigger space and Circuit QED but resonator which are sort of attention recently as candidate platforms realizing strongly correlated manybody states black and because the possibilities use them as quantum simulators for interesting effects 1 of those 4 parsers switching value as larger muscle surveys the resonator losses in the near future experiments like using
01:09
it the 1st series and build be small and no
01:13
require external pumping to account losses so this in mind that have as their work is twofold on the 1 hand we investigate how the describe resonator arrays but physically accurately and the other 1 anticipated this is suspected in near future smallscale race the 1st part of our work involve looking as accurate mowers memories the Jenkins comes Hubbard model was introduced above is the full description of arrays coupled tunable systems it's natural citations of joint atoms for example polaritons but sometimes a purely bosonic of which arises naturally called an optical lattice is used to approximate the dynamics of reason is so simple incinerator making this approximation developing today all annotation a full description is novel effects not captured by the use of about so in this work we pet experiments accessible observables resonator is described by both models and to do this we need a meaningful way or not between to reach a semester will and I structure please of details of that we consider that compares spectra
02:17
correlation functions for small and mediumsize raised under reader bursts of it which is kind of a description I will transition experiments in realistic parameters the couplings loss rates refined in general there are important differences between the 2 modes with account additional atomic degree of freedom that the full description possesses and his 2nd power where to anticipate new future experiments were raised we need ways to simulate mediumsize arrays to solve the states in the systems we use a combination of the matrix per state representation to describe the area of quantum trajectories we found this combination is very efficient as the average of many independent yeah 2 realizations we can also a time steps and in many cases also lattice
03:03
sites so under this numeric approach with investigated 2 recently proposed manybody effects could be observed in erased when it properly described by the Giants comes have model with these effects were predicted to occur in purely photonic systems is inverse of approximation the 1st is
03:20
this very simple immunization name given to the family and character has about times under strong nominee conditions the results of his tiny
03:28
crystallization which refers to a prediction of Britain's become glued together in a certain sense when raises flow of particles of animosity array in both
03:37
cases we found glossaries equivalence when partly describe to us in a way however the subtle differences in tunability few with tiny case this reflects a general conclusions and
03:48
select the genome dissipative resonator ways must be described by the full James comes have evolved to make accurate physical predictions so the watching and please feel free to email any questions