AV-Portal 3.23.3 (4dfb8a34932102951b25870966c61d06d6b97156)

Non-equilibrium many-body effects in driven nonlinear resonator arrays

Video in TIB AV-Portal: Non-equilibrium many-body effects in driven nonlinear resonator arrays

Formal Metadata

Title
Non-equilibrium many-body effects in driven nonlinear resonator arrays
Title of Series
Author
License
CC Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 3.0 Unported:
You are free to use, adapt and copy, distribute and transmit the work or content in adapted or unchanged form for any legal and non-commercial purpose as long as the work is attributed to the author in the manner specified by the author or licensor and the work or content is shared also in adapted form only under the conditions of this license.
Identifiers
Publisher
Release Date
2012
Language
English

Content Metadata

Subject Area
Abstract
We study the non-equilibrium behavior of optically driven dissipative coupled resonator arrays. Assuming each resonator is coupled with a two-level system via a Jaynes–Cummings interaction, we calculate the many-body steady state behavior of the system under coherent pumping and dissipation. We propose and analyze the many-body phases using experimentally accessible quantities such as the total excitation number, the emitted photon spectra and photon coherence functions for different parameter regimes. In parallel, we also compare and contrast the expected behavior of this system assuming the local nonlinearity in the cavities is generated by a generic Kerr effect as described by the Bose–Hubbard (BH) model rather than a Jaynes–Cummings interaction. We find that the behavior of the experimentally accessible observables produced by the two models differs for realistic regimes of interactions even when the corresponding nonlinearities are of similar strength. We analyze in detail the extra features available in the Jaynes–Cummings–Hubbard (JCH) model originating from the mixed nature of the excitations and investigate the regimes where the BH approximation would faithfully match the JCH physics. We find that the latter is true for values of the light–matter coupling and losses beyond the reach of current technology. Throughout the study we operate in the weak pumping, fully quantum mechanical regime where approaches such as mean field theory fail, and instead use a combination of quantum trajectories and the time evolving block decimation algorithm to compute the relevant steady state observables. In our study we have assumed small to medium size arrays (from 3 up to 16 sites) and values of the ratio of coupling to dissipation rate g/γ ~ 20, which makes our results implementable with current designs in circuit QED and with near future photonic crystal set ups.

Related Material

Loading...
Effects unit Digital electronics Crystal structure Phased array Crystallographic defect Particle physics Photon Photonic crystal Separation process Hubbard-Modell Flight simulator LC circuit Hose coupling Quantum Digital electronics Photonic crystal Duty cycle Nuclear reactor Crystallographic defect Effects unit Automobile platform Cocktail party effect Plain bearing Thermodynamic equilibrium Optical cavity Phase (matter) Video Quantum
Optics Hot working Effects unit Phased array Evapotranspiration Lawn mower Phased array Access network Aerodynamics Fulling Atomism Joint Spare part Hubbard-Modell Polariton Polariton Mode of transport
Trajectory Effects unit Crystallization Phased array Photon Matrix (printing) Laser Hose coupling Angeregter Zustand Quantum Trajectory Phased array Arc lamp Active laser medium Power (physics) Atomism Cartridge (firearms) Lungenautomat Nanotechnology Angeregter Zustand Mode of transport Ion Burst (band) Cylinder block Quantum Polarisierte Strahlung
Phased array Photonic crystal Ultra Crystallization Dipol Photon Volumetric flow rate Fermion Polariton Elementary particle Laser Polarisierte Strahlung Triton <Physik>
Cartridge (firearms) Effects unit Hubbard-Modell Phased array
hello this is a Dirichlet prior written submission to interview so here we duties and workers d Nash Stephen Clarke and myself Tonga which was done by describing the kinds of structure as is it possible realization of tiny crystal geometry where defects in the crystal form leisure is in a sense of Britain's concur him in town between sites we use the molarity is publicly coupling each resonance site with a tunable system is described by James comes interaction the governing Hamiltonian for the total system here is known as the James coming some above the reactor several other promising technologies to realize time but a bigger space and Circuit QED but resonator which are sort of attention recently as candidate platforms realizing strongly correlated many-body states black and because the possibilities use them as quantum simulators for interesting effects 1 of those 4 parsers switching value as larger muscle surveys the resonator losses in the near future experiments like using
it the 1st series and build be small and no
require external pumping to account losses so this in mind that have as their work is twofold on the 1 hand we investigate how the describe resonator arrays but physically accurately and the other 1 anticipated this is suspected in near future small-scale race the 1st part of our work involve looking as accurate mowers memories the Jenkins comes Hubbard model was introduced above is the full description of arrays coupled tunable systems it's natural citations of joint atoms for example polaritons but sometimes a purely bosonic of which arises naturally called an optical lattice is used to approximate the dynamics of reason is so simple incinerator making this approximation developing today all annotation a full description is novel effects not captured by the use of about so in this work we pet experiments accessible observables resonator is described by both models and to do this we need a meaningful way or not between to reach a semester will and I structure please of details of that we consider that compares spectra
correlation functions for small and medium-size raised under reader bursts of it which is kind of a description I will transition experiments in realistic parameters the couplings loss rates refined in general there are important differences between the 2 modes with account additional atomic degree of freedom that the full description possesses and his 2nd power where to anticipate new future experiments were raised we need ways to simulate medium-size arrays to solve the states in the systems we use a combination of the matrix per state representation to describe the area of quantum trajectories we found this combination is very efficient as the average of many independent yeah 2 realizations we can also a time steps and in many cases also lattice
sites so under this numeric approach with investigated 2 recently proposed many-body effects could be observed in erased when it properly described by the Giants comes have model with these effects were predicted to occur in purely photonic systems is inverse of approximation the 1st is
this very simple immunization name given to the family and character has about times under strong nominee conditions the results of his tiny
crystallization which refers to a prediction of Britain's become glued together in a certain sense when raises flow of particles of animosity array in both
cases we found glossaries equivalence when partly describe to us in a way however the subtle differences in tunability few with tiny case this reflects a general conclusions and
select the genome dissipative resonator ways must be described by the full James comes have evolved to make accurate physical predictions so the watching and please feel free to e-mail any questions
Loading...
Feedback
hidden